Global Warming?

[tcreeley]

?:laughing:? ...so, your buying ice cream... right?

Cool.

Tasty!

 

[tcreeley]

I don't disagree with your statement about climate change and worsening weather. What I deny is the liberal agenda behind the "global warming / climate change" movement. I think everyone involved in this thread fully is aware that the climate is always changing...past, present, future. The Text I refer to, has a record of past climate change. It also has the forecast for the future climate change. The forecast in the Text has far more dire predictions... Yet the Text deniers show no concern for the Text. I guess those Text deniers don't care about the planet, humanity, or themselves...or the Creator.

Denying the Truth, is so odd. We agree there.

Are you willing to plan for future climate problems?

 

[tcreeley]

That's funny considering the last 3 years of major hurricane activity are way below normal.

What we have had recently is two low level hurricane/tropical storms that are so large, and intense that they have contributed a major amount of damage. Just think if they had been Cat 4 or 5 hurricanes and as large as Sandy. Sandy was so big - it sucked in a cold front from Canada. The old hurricanes of our youth were never this large and wide ranging.

 

[tcreeley]

What you saying is if we all believe in GW, and put solar and wind up and walk to work there will not be any storms like Sandy. You would have to be a idiot to think that...

HS

Simplistic response

 

[tcreeley]

Re: @ robert Brown....???

Scientists and meteorologists have asked us not to take individual storms as evidence of GW or AGW. We can take an extreme cold snap as evidence of global cooling otherwise. Do we do what the scientists and meteorologists requested or not?

However, a couple of politicians DID come out and say this storm is evidence of AGW. Do we get science from politicians? No? What DO we get from them? Politics? Hmmm...

Yay-sayers are not more helpful to the cause of science than Nay-sayers.

You are not exactly a disinterested observer! I wouldn't worry about it. Do what ever you want.

 

[tcreeley]

If everyone capitulates and agrees with you, what will that do for you? I don't understand why people care to try to win the hearts and minds so desperately?

It is time we address and plan for global warming disasters- before the fact, not after they happen.


In a purely tractor world- we'd call that regular maintenance. If we actually addressed the causes of global warming - that would be preventative maintenance. Is this a radical concept- that is difficult to understand?:laughing::laughing::laughing::laughing:

 

[lockhaven]

this BS of comparing hurricanes by the amount of damage is absurd, the houses in the 60's built on the barrier islands were tiny cottages many just sat on blocks or poles, now tremendous mansions are being built on the same shifting sand and far more are there to boot. a hurricane of the exact same magnitude will do hundreds of times more damage same as tornadoes and wildfire. And in the case of New Orleans the Army core of Engineers are to blame the levies are destroying the marshes so now the hurricanes hit with full force instead of being softened by extensive marsh land. I guess it makes good news propaganda to talk about how much more severe the storms are now.

 

[Tollster]

this BS of comparing hurricanes by the amount of damage is absurd, the houses in the 60's built on the barrier islands were tiny cottages many just sat on blocks or poles, now tremendous mansions are being built on the same shifting sand and far more are there to boot. a hurricane of the exact same magnitude will do hundreds of times more damage same as tornadoes and wildfire. And in the case of New Orleans the Army core of Engineers are to blame the levies are destroying the marshes so now the hurricanes hit with full force instead of being softened by extensive marsh land. I guess it makes good news propaganda to talk about how much more severe the storms are now.

Agreed, my post reflects to its overall size.

 

[madmax12]

Are you willing to plan for future climate problems?

A yes response requires so much more explanation...delving into subjects not quite suited to this thread, though required for a comprehensive reply.

Short answer, yes. But what I mean will probably vary considerably from your yes.

You still buying ice cream? That gave the thread a more appealing pull, for me.

 

[toppop52]

If I use TC's logic....it's been 7-10 degrees below normal for a week now here, quick, get out the Wooley Mamouth repellent! :laughing:

Others ; explain why global cooling, fairly dramatic cooling, between 1950-1972 was not the harbinger of an ice age, yet warming over roughly the same relative time is **** coming to earth? Why will the dire predictions all come true, when the violent hurricane seasons prediction has been such a flop, nobody is about to repopulate Greenland, there are no current plans for nudist beaches in Antarctica and they're still selling winter coats at Macey's?

Careful guys, the mutants created by the summer heat, even sounds weird to say, a hot summer, wow! Anyway, those heat monsters are coming or y-o-u! :laughing: