I work for a Newspaper. 15 years ago a cop was killed. After the trial, his widow was exiting a rear courthouse door. One of our photogs attempted to take her picture. She was surrounded by cops. They asked him not to take the picture. He had the right to take it as it was in a public place. He took it, the cops got angry, he fled, the cops lumped him up mildly. There was a lawsuit. The photog won, of course, because he had the right to take the photo. But personally, while I support his right to take that photo, he should have had the common courtesy to not take it when requested. He should have had a little more humanity and the cops should have been more professional.
The media should report the facts in an unbiased manner. Save the commentary for the editorials. If they wanted to illustrate how many people in an area have firearm permits, they could have just posted the numbers for a given area, not the names and addresses of those people.
Maybe they'll do a story about the elections and post the names and addresses of all the folks that voted in the primaries next. That's all public info too. Bet that'll go over just as well.
So's the make and model of your car. Maybe they should post all the luxury car owner's names and addresses.
And don't forget hunting licenses. Fishing licenses. Too.