TripleR
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2009
- Messages
- 18,084
- Location
- Missouri
- Tractor
- Kubota M8540HDC, L5740HSTC, BX2200, BX2660, John Deere 425&1025R, Case, Massey Ferguson, Ford
@ hchxoom:
It was not my intention to be condescending. The question was phrased from a point of view of someone that does not for a second understand the 2A and everything associated with it but it trying. I appreciate your response, it helped, Triple R: I know you were trying also.
Unfortunately, from an outsider's point of view there were many following comments that to me read (with a big puffy chest) "I'm an American and I can do what I want 'cause I say so". As someone else said, sanity is subjective. US (and others) are quick to label Middle Eastern views as "insane" yet heaven forbid ask a question about something American?
I'm not against gun ownership. I don't understand the needs or desires to have a loaded one in every room of the house. I'm certainly not so naive to think that gun control will eliminate crime. I do think that controlling/limiting access would significantly reduce the opportunity for someone to go on a killing spree with legal guns. A pistol for protection? I disagree but can accept. A handful of rifles for hunting? I'm good with that (different game needs different gun right?) A loaded assault rifle? You loose me there. More ammo on hand than the local PD? I don't get that either.
My original question still stands: Is there similar gun (un)regulation to the US and mass shootings anywhere else in the world? It's just a question about fact, nothing about beliefs or rights or anything else.
I had pretty much dropped out of this thread and even written a few fairly long responses then thought "Naw, not worth it", deleted and moved on to just reading, but you mentioned my name and feel compelled to post something even if it's not totally responsive.
I really don't know how to even address, "I'm an American and I can do what I want 'cause I say so", but if you can point to the genesis of this "impressions", I might be able to help. Taken by itself without qualification it sounds pretty offensive of an evaluation, so an explanation may be helpful. I suppose I could say from reading the posts from Australians and Canadians, "Well, I'm from Australia, Canada and we have fixed all of our problems and don't understand why you blood thirty, paranoid Americans are just too dumb to understand how wrong you are, all you have to do is be just like us."
I could not disagree more with "As someone else said, sanity is subjective." I have committed people for mental evaluations, attended competency hearings, administrated screening evaluations and read more psychiatric reports than you can imagine. I supervised people who worked with the mentally ill and worked with many myself. To be "insane" a person has to meet several legal criteria and is anything but a capricious designation. This whole thing has been the subject of legislative attempts in this country in the past and some legislators wanted to deny a large section of our population including veterans who were involved in group counseling from firearms ownership. There are of course legitimate concerns, but extreme caution must be used and blanket statements rarely are accurate.
"I don't understand the needs or desires to have a loaded one in every room of the house." I don't either and right now it would probably take me ten to twenty minutes to get to any kind of gun and would have to get into a safe to do it or travel to the other end of a fairly large home. It doesn't bother me however if someone else feels the need or has the desire. If I felt the need to have access to a gun which I did for many years, I just carried it on me. When I came home, I just didn't take my gun off and I always knew where it was.
"A loaded assault rifle" You are obviously not alone, but I have no problem with it and am use to it as they are so common where I live, no one really pays much attention to them, just a cultural thing. I lived many years without one and can do so again if necessary, I just feel neither I nor my weapons present a danger and will keep them. I my sons and grandson all enjoy shooting them, so that's enough for us. My sons have military experience and became use to using them there and my grandson is enlisted in the Army where he will go upon graduation from high school. They all hunt with bolt action rifles.
"More ammo on hand than the local PD" Many of us have found that buying in bulk is much cheaper and as a result may have quite a bit on hand. Some have also found that a group of people may just want to go shooting one day and you need ammo to do that. If you shoot for fun, competition or to maintain a certain level of proficiency, you are going to need ammo and we have pretty much all gone to the store and found they were out of ammo. I have over 600 gallons of diesel on hand at any one time and prefer not to buy "as needed", I see it no differently with ammo. Oh, I also try to keep a supply of food on hand as we live in an earthquake zone and have power outages with storms.
My original question still stands: Is there similar gun (un)regulation to the US and mass shootings anywhere else in the world? It's just a question about fact, nothing about beliefs or rights or anything else. No to be rude or dismissive, but I honestly don't care, I don't live anywhere else and as I have said, I really don't think you can compare countries. One of my deleted posts went into demographics, population densities, cultural differences etc., but I got bored, too much like work and if you read very much of this you will literally die of boredom.
I am retired and intend to stay that way, if you are all that interested in it then by all means have at it, do the research and educate us. In the end, it will not change my mind or I imagine many others.
As I have told other posters, we just seem to disagree and I can live with that.
No intention to be rude, dismissive or disrespectful and if I have come across that way, I apologize.