I've ranted about CorporateGovernment in other threads.... this comment from the CBC article is a good summation. I have no direct experience with Transport Canada on these matters, but I'll be surprised if the commenter is wrong.
"However, agreed on Pt. 2 - railways govern themselves. As with food inspection, Transport Canada has morphed from an inspection and enforcement role to an audit role, without the legislative tools to force companies to enforce or fine companies for deficiencies in their audit results. Essentially, they've established a feedback loop where TC audits, tells the company they're not doing something, the company replies, often not fixing the safety problem, and then TC goes back and audits again... but since their is no penalty for a poor audit, there is no cost... oh yeah, and TC has to give the company 30 days notice that they're conducting an audit. "
Same guy, raised some other critical points:
"Lots of discussions in the media about reasons why the air brakes may have failed, but this does not explain why hand brakes failed as well.
Also doesn't explain why there was only one locomotive attached to a train that handles 10,000 tons and why they leave a train on a grade without setting derails so a runaway train cannot run down the hill into a populated area.
Either full procedures for securing an unattended train were not being followed, or the procedures in place were woefully inadequate."
I'd always had the impression that our government had taken a "hands-off" approach to railways, but I didn't think it was quite this bad.
Rgds, D.