Buying Advice JD 5075E vs Kubota 7060 both with cabs

   / JD 5075E vs Kubota 7060 both with cabs #51  
Ovrszd, while everything that you say is true, just so that others do not get the wrong idea, all of these things can be accomplished with a diverter valve setup without ever taking your hand off of the joystick or even using a rear remote. It may not be as convenient, but most definitely doable. ;)

If you have a chance, it would be interesting (for me anyway) to see a video of just what speed all 3 functions operate at when operated at the same time at whatever RPM it is that you normally work at. :cool: Just empty, nothing in the loader, just the motions. Actually thinking about it, it would be cool to time, just the lift cycle, then the lift and curl cycles and then all 3 functions at once. That would give everyone a true sense of just how much each function affects the other. ;)

Brian, actually your first paragraph is inaccurate. A diverter valve never at any time allows you to perform three functions at once. All a diverter valve does is exactly what it's name implies, it diverts oil flow. It's like a Y in the oil path. Imagine the oil pressure moving up the Y from the bottom. When it reaches the split, it has to go to the left or to the right. This is determined by whether you have the button pushed which activates the diverter valve or not. For example, no button push and all flow goes to the left or to the curl of your bucket. Push the button and all flow goes to the right or to the 3rd function. NEVER AT ANY TIME does the flow go to BOTH.

With a true 3rd function setup there is oil flow available to the bucket lift, bucket curl and 3rd function simultaneously. All that is diminished if 3rd function is activated is speed. Same thing applies when you perform bucket lift and bucket curl simultaneously. Or perform each function, lift/curl/3rd function individually and the speed picks up.

Naturally the tractor is only capable of a certain gallon per minute (gpm) flow. Again, for example, using easy math, assume the tractor is capable of 21 gpm. Three different scenarios are possible.

1. When only one function is activated all 21 gpm goes to that task which is lightening speed. My Grapple slams open and slams shut in a second or less if operated alone.

2. When two functions are activated all 21 gpm is split between two tasks. Now you have 10.5 gpm of flow at each function. Now my Grapple slows and firmly opens/shuts without slamming.

3. When all three functions are activated all 21 gpm is split between three tasks. Now you have 7 gpm of flow is each function. Now my Grapple gently opens/shuts.

What my system gains over a diverter is there IS ACTION in all three functions regardless of how slow. Thus, I can set my Grapple down as shown in the first picture and in one smooth move, pick up that log, with no diversion back and forth between Curl and Grapple. Is that ability paramount?? Nope. Is it more convenient? Definitely. At the end of the day is it more productive?? WAYYYY more productive.

For anyone that is familiar with a Backhoe. The digger boom on a hoe has three cylinders. One lifts the boom. One bends the elbow. One bends the wrist or curls the bucket. Would you rather run a hoe that will do all three of those functions at once, even if it's at a slower pace??? Or would you rather have a button on the boom lever that switches the elbow function and wrist back and forth, never performing both at once??

This gets us to your second paragraph. I agree it will be interesting to see these functions performed individually, then two at a time, then all three at a time to judge how much speed is lost. I'll make that a priority in the video as well. Good point. :)
 
   / JD 5075E vs Kubota 7060 both with cabs #52  
Brian, actually your first paragraph is inaccurate. A diverter valve never at any time allows you to perform three functions at once. All a diverter valve does is exactly what it's name implies, it diverts oil flow. It's like a Y in the oil path. Imagine the oil pressure moving up the Y from the bottom. When it reaches the split, it has to go to the left or to the right. This is determined by whether you have the button pushed which activates the diverter valve or not. For example, no button push and all flow goes to the left or to the curl of your bucket. Push the button and all flow goes to the right or to the 3rd function. NEVER AT ANY TIME does the flow go to BOTH.
:)

My intention was not to say that 3 functions could be done at once. My intent was to convey that all of these functions can be done with an electric diverter and a persons hand never has to leave the control grip. I thought that some where in the thread something was mentioned about not having to remove your hand from the joystick when a person has a true 3rd function setup, which is correct. :thumbsup: I just wanted to have people know that even with a diverter setup, you still do not have to be moving your hand around from one control to another.;)

While it seems that using all 3 functions is faster, and I will not argue that it is not, how much faster is it actually? If a person knows what they are doing and knows how to operate their equipment, I personally can't see that it is a HUGE difference, a few seconds maybe? :confused3: So even if we say that it takes 10 seconds longer (I doubt) to get all the different movements done with a diverter vs a true 3rd function, after 100 cycles you have saved about 17 minutes. Is this beneficial, you bet, if you do it for a living. Is it that big of a deal for us weekenders, I don't think so, but then that is only my opinion and obviously many others do indeed vary. ;)

I think that it comes down to so many things for anyone that does not do the particular task for a living, it really does not make that big of a difference. Reminds me of people that take their tractor in and out of 4x4 mode because they want to save on wear and tear on the drive line even though they only operate on forgiving surfaces. Does it make a difference, absolutely. Does it make a difference in that persons lifetime of using the tractor a couple hundred hours a year, no not really.


Just my :2cents:
 
   / JD 5075E vs Kubota 7060 both with cabs #53  
My intention was not to say that 3 functions could be done at once. My intent was to convey that all of these functions can be done with an electric diverter and a persons hand never has to leave the control grip. I thought that some where in the thread something was mentioned about not having to remove your hand from the joystick when a person has a true 3rd function setup, which is correct. :thumbsup: I just wanted to have people know that even with a diverter setup, you still do not have to be moving your hand around from one control to another.;)

While it seems that using all 3 functions is faster, and I will not argue that it is not, how much faster is it actually? If a person knows what they are doing and knows how to operate their equipment, I personally can't see that it is a HUGE difference, a few seconds maybe? :confused3: So even if we say that it takes 10 seconds longer (I doubt) to get all the different movements done with a diverter vs a true 3rd function, after 100 cycles you have saved about 17 minutes. Is this beneficial, you bet, if you do it for a living. Is it that big of a deal for us weekenders, I don't think so, but then that is only my opinion and obviously many others do indeed vary. ;)

I think that it comes down to so many things for anyone that does not do the particular task for a living, it really does not make that big of a difference. Reminds me of people that take their tractor in and out of 4x4 mode because they want to save on wear and tear on the drive line even though they only operate on forgiving surfaces. Does it make a difference, absolutely. Does it make a difference in that persons lifetime of using the tractor a couple hundred hours a year, no not really.


Just my :2cents:

I very much enjoy these conversations with you Brian. You never get pissy and defensive. You are always logical in your tactics. I respect that. And I never take our discussion personal. They are simply a matter of opinion that offers information to those that might not know the differences. :thumbsup:

I never said it was necessarily faster. I said it's more productive. Although I truly believe it to be slightly faster in the right hand (pun intended). In the end it's just much, much more convenient. No confusion about what action the operator is trying to accomplish.

In regards to your last paragraph. Let me try an analogy.

Is a Hydraulic Shuttle more productive and faster than a Synchro Shuttle??? Depends on who you ask!!! For me, definitely. Love my Hydraulic Shuttle and wouldn't want to downgrade to a Synchro Shuttle. On the other hand there are operators that use a Synchro Shuttle daily and get along fine. I'm satisfied with that. Whatever the operator is accustomed to. Which is better?? I'll let you answer that Brian.... ;) ;)



Just my :twocents:
 
   / JD 5075E vs Kubota 7060 both with cabs #54  
I very much enjoy these conversations with you Brian. You never get pissy and defensive. You are always logical in your tactics. I respect that. And I never take our discussion personal. They are simply a matter of opinion that offers information to those that might not know the differences. :thumbsup:

I never said it was necessarily faster. I said it's more productive. Although I truly believe it to be slightly faster in the right hand (pun intended). In the end it's just much, much more convenient. No confusion about what action the operator is trying to accomplish.

In regards to your last paragraph. Let me try an analogy.

Is a Hydraulic Shuttle more productive and faster than a Synchro Shuttle??? Depends on who you ask!!! For me, definitely. Love my Hydraulic Shuttle and wouldn't want to downgrade to a Synchro Shuttle. On the other hand there are operators that use a Synchro Shuttle daily and get along fine. I'm satisfied with that. Whatever the operator is accustomed to. Which is better?? I'll let you answer that Brian.... ;) ;)



Just my :twocents:

Well, one of my problems is that I have (what I consider) a very narrow window of tractor use in my knowledge base. :( So for me to say, "this is how it is" would be naive of me to insist upon things only being one way. Now that is not to say that I have not talked in absolutes before, but I try not to, because there is almost always an exception and that always nagates the absolute that you had just mentioned. I will say that if some parameters are installed, it is much easier to then talk in absolutes.

As far as the true 3rd function, I don't know how good it is, because I use the diverter setup. I would definitely have it if I was making a living with my equipment or if I had a 4n1 bucket. but I do not have or do either with my equipment. Maybe if I ever get caught up with Fit Rite production, I will install a true 3rd function on my small tractor just to see how it works with a 7.5 GPM pump. :cool:

As far as a synchro shuttle and a power shuttle, we have both. I do not feel that one is any faster than the other, but the power shuttle does seem to be less tiring and if there is a choice, I would go with the power shuttle. But then I feel the same with HST, I have it, it has it's own pluses and minuses, but as far as one being soooooo much better than the other, not for me. ;)
 
   / JD 5075E vs Kubota 7060 both with cabs #55  
Good points Brian. You actually have taken my side in most of this and I respect that. I say this about many things in the tractor World. Use a given system for several hundred hours and you will then know which is ultimately better and why. The 3rd function over diverter valve, or the Hydraulic Shuttle over Synchro Shuttle both fall in that category. Hours of use prove the differences. I'm not opposed to either. I'm just clarifying advantages, one over the other.

Now I'm all pumped up about making a video. Come on Warm Weather!!! :)
 
   / JD 5075E vs Kubota 7060 both with cabs #56  
Good points Brian. You actually have taken my side in most of this and I respect that. I say this about many things in the tractor World. Use a given system for several hundred hours and you will then know which is ultimately better and why. The 3rd function over diverter valve, or the Hydraulic Shuttle over Synchro Shuttle both fall in that category. Hours of use prove the differences. I'm not opposed to either. I'm just clarifying advantages, one over the other.

Now I'm all pumped up about making a video. Come on Warm Weather!!! :)

Talking about weather, at what temp do you guys start dressing differently, both cold and hot???
 
   / JD 5075E vs Kubota 7060 both with cabs #57  
Talking about weather, at what temp do you guys start dressing differently, both cold and hot???

In Summer I'm a shorts/T-shirt guy. Start wearing shorts when daily temps reach low 70s. Last Summer I stayed with Shorts until early October. Felt weird when I put on a pair of jeans.

In Winter I like heavy duty sweatshirts, no need for a breast pocket. I buy Dutch Harbor Gear sweatshirts and will wear one almost every day until it warms enough to go T-shirt, high 60s.
 
   / JD 5075E vs Kubota 7060 both with cabs #58  
We don't get much variation here. :( It's pretty much Tee shirt weather all the time, 60s-80s. If I could ever get moved up into the mountains, they actually have seasons up there. :drool:
 
   / JD 5075E vs Kubota 7060 both with cabs #59  
We don't get much variation here. :( It's pretty much Tee shirt weather all the time, 60s-80s. If I could ever get moved up into the mountains, they actually have seasons up there. :drool:

Heheheheheh. Right now I'd trade with ya. 12 degrees with 20mph NW wind. The shop dog even hates to go outside to pee. :)
 
   / JD 5075E vs Kubota 7060 both with cabs #60  
i dress in tee shirts an jeans year round.wearing a light jacket during winter when im out.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2011 Liebherr L586 (A51039)
2011 Liebherr L586...
2017 Ford F-550 Ext. Cab Valve Maintenance Truck (A50323)
2017 Ford F-550...
1265 (A50490)
1265 (A50490)
1268 (A50490)
1268 (A50490)
2018 PETERBILT 579 TANDEM AXLE SLEEPER (A51222)
2018 PETERBILT 579...
Craftsman LT2000 42in. Riding Mower (A49346)
Craftsman LT2000...
 
Top