A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's

   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's #1  

dave1949

Super Star Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
12,461
Location
nowhere, md
Tractor
Hanomag
I ran across this today and thought it interesting for what history may have to teach us about civic problems and how they eventually get solved. Not a lot has changed within that basic paradigm since then.

The street scenes are interesting in and of themselves with the old cars, trolley electric lines above the streets, and tracks. One thing that hasn't changed, there was no place to park. :laughing:

Stunning Photos of 1940s Pittsburgh: Life Before Effective Air Pollution Laws

There a couple of pollution events that are referenced in the slide show.

The 1948 "Donora, PA Death Fog" Oct. 26, 1948: Death Cloud Envelops Pennsylvania Mill Town
1948: An inversion layer settles over the rust belt town of Donora, Pennsylvania, trapping industrial pollution in the atmosphere. When it clears six days later, 20 people are dead, another 50 are dying and hundreds will live out their days with permanently damaged lungs.

The companies connived with the U.S. Public Health Service to cover up the facts of the incident and succeeded in doing so for half a century. Whistle-blowers were silenced; records disappeared. It wasn't until 1994 that a full accounting of what happened in Donora was finally published.



The 1939 "Black Tuesday" in St. Louis, MO

A look back

"ST. LOUIS City dwellers woke up on Nov. 28, 1939, in a thick fog of acrid coal smoke. Suburbanites heading to work saw a low dome of darkness covering neighborhoods east of Kingshighway.

In a streetcar downtown at 8 a.m., a commuter told the driver, "Let me off at 13th and Washington - if you can find it." Motorists drove slowly with headlights on. Streetlights, still on, made ghostly glows.

The day became infamous as Black Tuesday, the worst of many smoke-choked days in what was to be St. Louis' smokiest cold-weather season. The city already was known for the nation's filthiest air, worse even than Pittsburgh's.

The reason was the area's reliance on cheap, dirty, high-sulfur "soft" coal dug from the hills and hollows across the Mississippi River in Illinois. St. Louis' first anti-smoke ordinance dated to 1867. But as the city grew in population and industry, the smoke kept getting worse.

In 1936, after years of civic debate, city aldermen required homes and businesses to install mechanical stokers in furnaces or burn "washed" local coal.

In 1937, Mayor Bernard F. Dickmann named his first assistant, Raymond R. Tucker, as smoke commissioner. Tucker, a former mechanical engineering professor at Washington University, was thorough, studious and dedicated.

In time, city leaders realized the only solution was to ban soft coal. Metro East interests threatened to boycott St. Louis products. Then came Black Tuesday, fortifying the reformers."
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's #3  
Whenever we are inclined to complain about EPA and environmental regulations, we should remember this.
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's
  • Thread Starter
#4  
Whenever we are inclined to complain about EPA and environmental regulations, we should remember this.

This is also informative, we tend to look back with rose colored glasses.
"The companies connived with the U.S. Public Health Service to cover up the facts of the incident and succeeded in doing so for half a century. Whistle-blowers were silenced; records disappeared. It wasn't until 1994 that a full accounting of what happened in Donora was finally published."
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's #5  
I recall driving into Nashville in the early 80's and not being able to see more than 100 yards because of the smog. It's not that long ago.

Now when someone drives by without a cat on their car, they might as well be waving a flag out the window.
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's #6  
Add in some smart phones and these could be picture from China today (where the steel work went to avoid the cost of pollution control and decent wages)
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's #7  
Knowing what Pittsburgh is like now that is hard to imagine. The good old days I guess.
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's #8  
Great post, what a mess.
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's #9  
Whenever we are inclined to complain about EPA and environmental regulations, we should remember this.

EPA was created long after this.
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's
  • Thread Starter
#10  
The EPA was created by Pres. Nixon on Dec. 2, 1970. Not that long after the 1940's.

Due to the corruption present in many state governments, then and now, without federal involvement there would be very little effective control of pollution. The states would play 'bargain to the bottom' in competition with each other for business and jobs--as they are doing now. Dirtiest state wins when you bargain away clean air and water.
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's #11  
We really should have some sort of "training" at the high school level where we put EVERYONE thru a day or two of thick noxious air pollution.

For those of you who have been thru the CS gas chambers you might know what I mean. My first trip thru we had a drill trying to get promoted. We spent a long time before we were allowed to put our masks on. My second trip (late '90's) I only got a wiff.

Also we need some flaming rivers like
cuy-river-fire1.jpg
the Cuyahoga River to show how we used to let pollution flow.
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's #12  
The EPA was created by Pres. Nixon on Dec. 2, 1970. Not that long after the 1940's.

Due to the corruption present in many state governments, then and now, without federal involvement there would be very little effective control of pollution. The states would play 'bargain to the bottom' in competition with each other for business and jobs--as they are doing now. Dirtiest state wins when you bargain away clean air and water.

Air pollution control laws, at the federal level, go back as far as 1955:

History | Clean Air Act | US EPA

The early statutes were not very effective, but subsequent enactments eventually strengthened the law until we are where we are today. Prior to legislation, about the only remedy was private/public nuisance laws, but taking on a steel mill or a refinery in court with nuisance laws is a tough thing for an individual, or even a municipality.

In my experience, the industry in this state and this country, while no pushovers, are willing and able to comply with reasonable pollution control laws...but they do want to be treated rationally and fairly. If GM has to comply, then they expect Ford and Chrysler to have to comply to the same extent.
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's
  • Thread Starter
#13  
Air pollution control laws, at the federal level, go back as far as 1955:

History | Clean Air Act | US EPA

The early statutes were not very effective, but subsequent enactments eventually strengthened the law until we are where we are today. Prior to legislation, about the only remedy was private/public nuisance laws, but taking on a steel mill or a refinery in court with nuisance laws is a tough thing for an individual, or even a municipality.

In my experience, the industry in this state and this country, while no pushovers, are willing and able to comply with reasonable pollution control laws...but they do want to be treated rationally and fairly. If GM has to comply, then they expect Ford and Chrysler to have to comply to the same extent.

I think that is generally true, they sort of stay within the rules. They also spend a lot of time, money and effort to bend the rules in their favor. When they find a soft target, such as a governor who has no concept of environmentalism except to hate it, and loves their campaign donations, they really go to work to take advantage of that. Given that, it isn't the values of environmentalism that they embrace; it's pain avoidance in the form of fines, legal entanglements and bad publicity that keeps them mostly honest.

Our current governor has muzzled state employees in the EPA-DNR areas, deleted most of the information in the state's web sites dealing with EPA and DNR-type issues, and appointed industry lawyer-lobbyists to head those departments.

To tell a state biologist they cannot speak in public, even after business hours, without the venue being pre-approved, and their speech content must be also pre-approved, is un-American IMO. The political agenda supersedes fact and truth.

Who rewards such behavior by a governor? It is simply a strategy to control information that the public should be allowed to hear, comment upon, and sort out for themselves.

What do you think about that, given your years of experience? How common is that around the country?
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's #14  
Anyone ever remember driving through Gary, Indiana in the 60's? Holy cow that was bad. Everything, and I mean EVERTYTHING was orange. The steel mill building, electric towers, guard rails, houses, power lines, everything was orange from the pollution. Sometimes you couldn't see the road very well had had to slow down, the smoke was so thick.
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's #15  
<snip?
Our current governor has muzzled state employees in the EPA-DNR areas, deleted most of the information in the state's web sites dealing with EPA and DNR-type issues, and appointed industry lawyer-lobbyists to head those departments.

To tell a state biologist they cannot speak in public, even after business hours, without the venue being pre-approved, and their speech content must be also pre-approved, is un-American IMO. The political agenda supersedes fact and truth.

Who rewards such behavior by a governor? It is simply a strategy to control information that the public should be allowed to hear, comment upon, and sort out for themselves.

What do you think about that, given your years of experience? How common is that around the country?

Bush did that with climate scientists and anything against oil production.
The Bush Environmental Record: More than 300 Crimes against Nature
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's #16  
I think that is generally true, they sort of stay within the rules. They also spend a lot of time, money and effort to bend the rules in their favor. When they find a soft target, such as a governor who has no concept of environmentalism except to hate it, and loves their campaign donations, they really go to work to take advantage of that. Given that, it isn't the values of environmentalism that they embrace; it's pain avoidance in the form of fines, legal entanglements and bad publicity that keeps them mostly honest.

Our current governor has muzzled state employees in the EPA-DNR areas, deleted most of the information in the state's web sites dealing with EPA and DNR-type issues, and appointed industry lawyer-lobbyists to head those departments.

To tell a state biologist they cannot speak in public, even after business hours, without the venue being pre-approved, and their speech content must be also pre-approved, is un-American IMO. The political agenda supersedes fact and truth.

Who rewards such behavior by a governor? It is simply a strategy to control information that the public should be allowed to hear, comment upon, and sort out for themselves.

What do you think about that, given your years of experience? How common is that around the country?

I'm not quite sure what the situation is in Maine, so it's difficult to comment. I will say that industry has been known to fight tooth and nail against certain rules, but that's their right. It is also their right to garner as much political influence as they can, at least during the legislative and rule making phase. I have never experienced (at least knowingly) where industry deliberately bribed local authorities to escape compliance with the law. Environmental laws are for the most part a federal/state effort. EPA writes the rules, and states, under their own programs, implement them. It's possible for a state to refuse to implement the rules or to even be very lax in doing so, but EPA also has primary jurisdiction, and if the state doesn't do the job, EPA will know, and can, and will eventually step in...and the results are generally much harsher than dealing with the state. So I guess my point is that there is little incentive for the state to not enforce the law, so I'm curious as to what's going on in your state. It's not uncommon for states and EPA to sue each other, but EPA really does not want a knock down drag out with a state...Congress may have to settle it. The state does have enough latitude to affect the general over all approach to enforcement such that it can result in them being fairly lenient.

As for state employees and public speaking, most states have a public information division that will exert some control over public statements. If the subject is controversial or politically sensitive, they will often micro manage what is said and what information is given to the press. I have seen the press crucify state employees by twisting their statements and taking them out of context. I have never experienced a problem with censorship, and have made quite a few presentations to colleges and at Environmental Seminars. Press conferences were usually pretty well regimented however, and statements to the press as well.

I am curious as to what is going on in your state; do you have a link or reference?
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's
  • Thread Starter
#17  
<snip>
I am curious as to what is going on in your state; do you have a link or reference?

This series of articles, "Lobbyist In the Henhouse" is a good overview. Now, I will tell you the current governor and this newspaper are sworn enemies from two different tribes. But, there has been very little if any rebuttal offered on the content of these reports.
'The Lobbyist in the henhouse' DEP series | The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram

Purposely "missed" state input into dam operations:
Maine legislators try to end missed dam deadlines | The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram


DEP calls for weakening of Maine smog regulations | The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram
Easing of Maine smog rules backed by paper mills | The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's
  • Thread Starter
#18  
Bush did that with climate scientists and anything against oil production.
The Bush Environmental Record: More than 300 Crimes against Nature

Yep, he was known for muzzling too, and giving political appointee hacks editorial censorship over anything published whether they understood the contents or not.

I know politics is a contact sport, but we (the public) paid the salaries, built the labs, bought the equipment and everything else needed by those folks to do their jobs and produce their work output. As long as no military secrets are given away, I think we basically "own" the results. If I own something and someone prevents me from using or accessing it, that is theft--in theory at least. :)

It really doesn't matter to me what political stripes are worn by people who try to subvert facts and basic truths. It's wrong and corrupt.

I understand to a point 2Lane's comment about the press mutilating people who aren't prepared to handle them. After some point of reasonableness though, it becomes foolish to practice censorship due to fearing the free press. What is in the press can be countered, what isn't known at all due to censorship cannot be acted upon in any way.
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's #19  
EPA, clean air Act, clean water act, endangered species act, all created by President Nixon. HS
 
   / A series of B&W photos of Pittsburgh air pollution in the 1940's #20  
This series of articles, "Lobbyist In the Henhouse" is a good overview. Now, I will tell you the current governor and this newspaper are sworn enemies from two different tribes. But, there has been very little if any rebuttal offered on the content of these reports.
'The Lobbyist in the henhouse' DEP series | The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram

Purposely "missed" state input into dam operations:
Maine legislators try to end missed dam deadlines | The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram


DEP calls for weakening of Maine smog regulations | The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram
Easing of Maine smog rules backed by paper mills | The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram

Check your PM.
 

Marketplace Items

GEARMATIC WINCH CABLE DRUM (A58214)
GEARMATIC WINCH...
2013 Ford Escape SUV (A59231)
2013 Ford Escape...
(20) WOOD PALLETS (A60432)
(20) WOOD PALLETS...
2006 Magnolia Dry Fertilizer Tender Trailer - Dual Stainless Compartments, Hydraulic Doors (A61307)
2006 Magnolia Dry...
2015 DODGE RAM 1500 CREW CAB TRUCK (A60430)
2015 DODGE RAM...
2007 Ford F-150 4x4 Ext. Cab Pickup Truck (A59230)
2007 Ford F-150...
 
Top