Jtschnel
Silver Member
Last night I had the opportunity to use my 1026R with a 47" snowblower. On parts of my drive I have to do a lot of short blows, backing up multiple times for the next short swath.
Last year, with my X485 and blower, when I pushed the reverse pedal the blower/pto stopped. As I was backing up I pushed the pto switch down and as soon as I started forward for the next swath I engaged the pto. Was a pain, but it got to where I could do it smoothly and quickly.
This year, with the 1026R when I did the same area, the response of the machine was different. When I got to the end of a short swath blowing and hit the reverse pedal the motor quit, not just the pto but the engine itself. If I took my foot off of the reverse pedal for an instant before the engine actually spooled down, it engaged and kept running. At that point in time I could push the reverse pedal again and move backward. At this point the pto had disengaged although the switch was still up in the on position. While backing up I pushed the pto switch down and as soon as I started forward again I pulled the pto switch up to engage the blower again.
I have a couple of questions:
1) has anyone else had the same issue of the engine cutting out with pto engaged and pushing the reverse pedal?
2) while blowing I generally run the machine at more than 2000 rpm, generally 2500 to 3000 rpm without slowing the engine rpm. How bad is this on the system engaging the pto at that speed?
3) I understand the safety aspect reasoning of shutting the pto off when going in reverse (although not cutting the engine) but I would rather have the pto stay engaged in reverse when I blowing and I suspect it would be easier on the machine. Has anyone gotten around this pto disengagement system?
Appreciate any feedback.
Jim
Last year, with my X485 and blower, when I pushed the reverse pedal the blower/pto stopped. As I was backing up I pushed the pto switch down and as soon as I started forward for the next swath I engaged the pto. Was a pain, but it got to where I could do it smoothly and quickly.
This year, with the 1026R when I did the same area, the response of the machine was different. When I got to the end of a short swath blowing and hit the reverse pedal the motor quit, not just the pto but the engine itself. If I took my foot off of the reverse pedal for an instant before the engine actually spooled down, it engaged and kept running. At that point in time I could push the reverse pedal again and move backward. At this point the pto had disengaged although the switch was still up in the on position. While backing up I pushed the pto switch down and as soon as I started forward again I pulled the pto switch up to engage the blower again.
I have a couple of questions:
1) has anyone else had the same issue of the engine cutting out with pto engaged and pushing the reverse pedal?
2) while blowing I generally run the machine at more than 2000 rpm, generally 2500 to 3000 rpm without slowing the engine rpm. How bad is this on the system engaging the pto at that speed?
3) I understand the safety aspect reasoning of shutting the pto off when going in reverse (although not cutting the engine) but I would rather have the pto stay engaged in reverse when I blowing and I suspect it would be easier on the machine. Has anyone gotten around this pto disengagement system?
Appreciate any feedback.
Jim