Why are you trying to put the burden of proof on those that oppose your (misguided) beliefs?
Good point slash. Dave is using Harry Reid logic (who said Romney had to disprove Reid's claim of tax evasion).
Why are you trying to put the burden of proof on those that oppose your (misguided) beliefs?
Why are you trying to put the burden of proof on those that oppose your (misguided) beliefs?
Good point slash. Dave is using Harry Reid logic (who said Romney had to disprove Reid's claim of tax evasion).
How did that work out for Mittens? :laughing:
Which of you deniers wants to show the science that explains fewer hurricane occurrences? Come on, I know you can do it.If you folks understand everything about the climate, how about some predictions of your own that can be checked on? Oh, you don't have any because PR machines don't produce science. I forgot.
If deniers understand the work of climate scientists as well as they would like to think they do, then surely they understand climate science itself. Show some results of that understanding--is that asking much? I don't think so.
How did that work out for Mittens? :laughing: