RobertBrown
Veteran Member
I can see that next month's TBN newsletter will highlight this thread.![]()
You must be so proud to have been a part of it. I know I am...
I can see that next month's TBN newsletter will highlight this thread.![]()
You must be so proud to have been a part of it. I know I am...(800 posts later :shocked
![]()
Maybe TBN can get us a group rate with a shrink.I can see that next month's TBN newsletter will highlight this thread.![]()
Maybe TBN can get us a group rate with a shrink.
Count me in
Terry
I can see that next month's TBN newsletter will highlight this thread.![]()
I wonder which faction will be highlighted
I agree... it is difficult to bring the masses 'up to speed' without painful laboring and having to endure the petty comments of the 'johnny come lately' crowd. We are having enough difficulty with keeping the squirrelists on track.To date, posters to this thread have been members of the scientific community. Featuring this thread in the newsletter would serve to draw the attention of the general membership, and they would certainly learn about science by reading our posts. However, the general membership may include those who have inflated opinions of their own knowledge of science and the scientific method. I fear that those members, the science il-literati, will think that they know more than we scientists, and will offer "wacky" theories to explain the pallet formations. Our progress will be slowed as we take the time to debunk their puerile conjectures.
Steve
Well then, no evaluation for me! And the rest of you know who you are! Actually, I am not sure about the validity of that last poignant point.Anyone who's posted more than ten messages on this thread, should be able to get in without an evaluation.
Oh and TomSellers I am sure, will join you on the board of directors.
Ouch!To date, posters to this thread have been members of the scientific community. Featuring this thread in the newsletter would serve to draw the attention of the general membership, and they would certainly learn about science by reading our posts. However, the general membership may include those who have inflated opinions of their own knowledge of science and the scientific method. I fear that those members, the science il-literati, will think that they know more than we scientists, and will offer "wacky" theories to explain the pallet formations. Our progress will be slowed as we take the time to debunk their puerile conjectures.
Steve