Firemanbuck
Bronze Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2013
- Messages
- 99
- Location
- WA
- Tractor
- Mitsubishi MT180H, Mahindra 26Max, Yanmar 35 mini-ex, Cub Cadet Lawn Trator
According to this: HARRINGTON v. WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT - FindLaw the Oregon watershed in which Harrington resides was closed to all water appropriation in 1925 after the State ruled that the waters are all appropriated for use by the City of Medford. Any diversion of water in that basin, therefore, other than by the City of Medford would be illegal.
This guy apparently had dug two ponds and was enjoying them, then went for a permit to dig another one. After first approving the permits, the State then reversed their decision and said no to the third and instructed him to open the headgates on the other two. On google earth, there are three very large ponds visible, so he was obviously thumbing his nose at the State.
This guy apparently had dug two ponds and was enjoying them, then went for a permit to dig another one. After first approving the permits, the State then reversed their decision and said no to the third and instructed him to open the headgates on the other two. On google earth, there are three very large ponds visible, so he was obviously thumbing his nose at the State.