dmccarty
Super Star Member
There is an article in today's WSJ about Dish and Fox. The head of Dish is playing hardball with a couple of Fox channels to get them to lower their prices. The CEO is trying to hold subscription costs to under $100 a month, surprised they have not gone over that amount all ready, so he is going for a lower price from the channels in question. The Fox channels say that other providers are paying the same amount but the article makes the point that many of the other providers are trying to merge with various companies and are not in a position to fight the current rate.
The CEO of Dish thinks that the providers are gong to have to have different channels over time as people cut the cord. Some channels will be on different services and some channels will disappear. Some channels will elect to be on certain providers and not on others. I suspect that will be the case as people stop watching the bad programming being provided. We cut the cord a few years ago and we won't be going back.
Some of the cable companies realize that their future is not in cable tv per say but in being an Internet service provider. I think that is what will happen. For us, there is better "programming" on YouTube than on the channels.
Later,
Dan
The CEO of Dish thinks that the providers are gong to have to have different channels over time as people cut the cord. Some channels will be on different services and some channels will disappear. Some channels will elect to be on certain providers and not on others. I suspect that will be the case as people stop watching the bad programming being provided. We cut the cord a few years ago and we won't be going back.
Some of the cable companies realize that their future is not in cable tv per say but in being an Internet service provider. I think that is what will happen. For us, there is better "programming" on YouTube than on the channels.
Later,
Dan