The reason I don't want to mention brands is because then it becomes an unbiased opinion from some. With everything else being equal, i just wanted thoughts on am I being silly paying more for a tractor that doesn't have a wet clutch but is more fuel efficient and is better built.
Weights are equal, hydraulic flows are the same. Both are 3 Cyclinder turbo but one has an intercooler. service intervals are the same. etc etc.
I know the benefits of a wet clutch. But as i previously said I'm not doing loader work. A lot of tillage and towing is what I'm using the tractor for.
Wat size clutches roughly were many of the older tractors fitted with, Mtnview?
Weights are equal, hydraulic flows are the same. Both are 3 Cyclinder turbo but one has an intercooler. service intervals are the same. etc etc.
I know the benefits of a wet clutch. But as i previously said I'm not doing loader work. A lot of tillage and towing is what I'm using the tractor for.
Wat size clutches roughly were many of the older tractors fitted with, Mtnview?