mo1
Platinum Member
But if the fuel efficiency of the GR2120 is ALREADY considerably better than the GR2020 . . . Imagine what it would be compared to the ECV749 engine.
Gas engines are superior to diesel engines when speed is the goal . . which is why cars, outboards, motorcycles, atvs and small engines are gas. But IMO when power is the goal and long term durability under power draw . . Diesel has the advantage and a considerable fuel efficiency improvement over gas. Thats why tractors, construction equopment, semi and hauling trucks of all sizes are diesel. Speed and weight versus power, efficiency, and durability.
Gasoline engines are also considerably less expensive to buy and their routine maintenance costs are lower than diesels, although the latter really only becomes very pronounced with much larger engines than in a SCUT/CUT. Whether or not you actually save any money in the long run in getting a diesel engine over a gasoline engine depends on the price differential, fuel consumption of the engine in gallons/hour, how many hours you put on the piece of equipment, and how long you keep the piece of equipment. It takes thousands of hours of operation to make up the cost of the diesel engine something like the Kubota GR when the overall fuel consumption rates are small and fuel cost differences are around a dollar an hour at current fuel prices. That's a whole lot different than a semi or twin screw dump truck (or a several hundred HP row-crop tractor) where the fuel cost differences would be about $50-75/hour between a diesel and a gasoline engine.
Your example of the Kubota GR21xx also brings up an important point in why diesels may seem more preferable than gassers in the same piece of equipment. A diesel engine is more expensive than a gasoline engine and the manufacturer will have a much easier time in getting people to shell out the extra cash if the buyer actually gets a larger/more powerful engine in the process. The GR's gasser is a smaller-displacement, lower-hp and lower-torque engine than the diesel Kubota specced to put in that unit. Kubota could have specced a smaller diesel with similar torque (but less HP)or a similar displacement (and less HP and torque) to the gasser, but it would likely sell relatively poorly compared to the more-powerful on all counts diesel they did spec. Look at 3/4 and 1-ton pickups' diesel engines. They sell well in no small part as they are considerably more powerful than the gasoline engines offered. Horsepower numbers are generally about the same as the largest gasser but there's twice as much torque and the engine as a result is a lot more powerful. Now compare that to the relatively anemic sales of the relatively anemic 3.0 L V6 VM Motori diesel in the Ram 1500. That engine is about as powerful as the base V6 but more expensive than any of the other engines (including the 5.7 L Hemi which is vastly more powerful), so it is JUST an "it gets better mileage" engine. Its sales are a tiny fraction of the total Ram 1500 units sold vs. the Cummins's share in the 2500 and 3500 units.