Let me clear the air. In my earlier post when I mentioned that I got the tractor priced without the loader, I never said ANYTHING about not getting one. My goal was just to price tractors side by side to get the best baseline comparison possible. Next step was the throw in any any additional items (FEL, box cutter, etc.) in the decision process, and price it up to my maximum limit (probably around $50k) to see where the chips fell. The fact that deer's got 0% financing was a big plus too.
I also understand that I can get almost all of what I need done with less tractor. But, I'm thinking that it's better to go bigger than on the small side. I agree that burning more fuel is a disadvantage, but not one that's overwhelming in my eyes. One other advantage I saw was the weight of a larger machine being a plus. Am I wrong on this?
Once I put add on's like loaders or cutters into the mix, I'm sure LS or Kioti will start to look attractive, and I'm sure they're really good too. The thing that's got me stuck on deere is that no one's really raved about some of the other lines like LS or Kioti, which was really what I was listening for here. Or, if anyone thinks it's really just a matter of shopping paint color (which I doubt) please speak up.
Outside of that, I get the dealer thing. Which is another thing that got me where I am. For instance, I'm sure Got2BTru's Mahindra is a great machine. But, when I went to the local dealer, I almost had to put a gun to someone's head to get them to talk to me. So, they were "out" pretty quick.
I'm very grateful for everyone's feedback, and hope you'll keep it coming. But, since were headed into election time, let's put it to a vote:
In the new mid-size tractor category right NOW, who gives you the most bang for your bucks???