In 1993 I went back and replaced every VFD I had installed with a CSV, and I have never looked back.
Now having said all of that, the pump system in this thread is not a very good candidate for a CSV. A 2HP, 13 GPM pump with a static water level of 220 will have a backpressure of 192 PSI when using a CSV. And while a 192 PSI backpressure is not a problem for the pump and/or the well pipe and the CSV would work fine, it is a little more backpressure than we like to handle with a CSV.
I would have tested the well, figured out the actual pumping level, and set the appropriate pump so as not to have that much backpressure. When you don稚 know how much or from how deep the well will produce, installing an extra large pump at the deepest setting is the only option. But even then, it is only a 13 GPM pump, so I would have just put in a couple of 80 gallon size pressure tanks and had a system that cost less and was more dependable than a VFD.
Also with 4.5" casing the VFD needs to be set up for the pump to flow a minimum of about 5 GPM required for motor cooling. So you would need a little larger tank, as the pump should be cycling on/off when using less than 5 GPM.
Working between 5 GPM and 13 GPM isn't much variation for a VFD or a CSV, which is another reason I would have just used a couple of tanks and no VFD.