pmsmechanic
Elite Member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2013
- Messages
- 4,226
- Location
- Southern Alberta, Canada
- Tractor
- 4410 and F-935 John Deere, MF 245
The infamous double post strikes again.
Never said people buy based on displacement, I am simply trying to show that with the technology available more HP and Tq are easily achievable.
Yes, if I had a 2000 lb, 300hp tractor I'd do burnouts any and everywhere I could.
With the unneeded extra HP I could mow my lawn and use 17 gallons of fuel rather than 1.2 gallons.
Or 5 gallons of water and a few chunks of coal... :thumbsup:
On a side note, once tractors get a little long on the tooth, bigger, higher HP models are often very cheap. You can buy a 100-200 HP Case, IH, Versatile, Allis-Chalmers for very cheap around here. If you want a tractor with major HP, buy one of them. Putting 100 HP in a compact is just gonna make it more complex, more expensive to buy, and more expensive to repair.
Pmsmechanic got it right. It's about duty cycle. You can run a tractor at full power at WOT all day long. That's what they're made for. You'd better not try running your new diesel pickup at WOT putting out it's full rated HP all day...
On a side note, once tractors get a little long on the tooth, bigger, higher HP models are often very cheap. You can buy a 100-200 HP Case, IH, Versatile, Allis-Chalmers for very cheap around here. If you want a tractor with major HP, buy one of them. Putting 100 HP in a compact is just gonna make it more complex, more expensive to buy, and more expensive to repair.