There are many townships in our county. All of them but one fall under the county auditor. The one county with its own auditor just hired a consultant to look at how properties are assessed. They found many instances where two neighboring properties of equal size and value were taxed at different rates. They can't figure out who changed the rates for those properties with lower taxes. Now they're going to go through all the properties in that township and make everyone pay equally.
So the county commissioners, seeing that it could bump up revenue, decided to hire the same consultant to analyse the townships under the county auditor's office. Guess what? The county auditor is dragging her feet and not getting the database to the consultant. Why? Because they'll find hundreds, if not thousands of people are paying too low of taxes as compared to their neighbors. And my guess is many of them will be of the same political party as the auditor and the names will be quite familiar to the local people. Grrrr!!!
Anyhow, Indiana passed a circuit breaker law back in 2008.
Its quite interesting...
http://www.in.gov/dlgf/files/CircuitBreakerFactSheet.pdf
And its starving local governments of income generated by property taxes. Most of us think that's O.K. However, we will see a reduction in services. And some of us think that's O.K., too.
Beginning with 2010 tax bills, property owners have been entitled to a
circuit breaker cap on the amount of property taxes over:
1% of homestead properties;
2% of residential properties;
2% of agricultural land;
2% of long-term care facilities;
3% of nonresidential properties; and
3% of personal property
As I recall (and I could be wrong), it was enacted because counties were setting the property tax rates, not the state. Some counties had HUGE property taxes. Some had very small.
Ours had depreciation. So if you had an old house, you'd pay lower property taxes than a new house. It didn't matter that your 100+ year old house in a historic neighborhood was worth $250,000. You payed squat in property tax compared to a new house that was worth $100,000. That ain't right or fair. It should have been based on assessed value period!
Another example is appeals. My in-laws built a brand new 1700 square foot house. Their neighbor built a 3500 square foot house. My in-laws were paying double the property taxes of the neighbors whose home was twice as large! The neighbor had appealed his taxes and had them lowered. My in-laws didn't know you could do that. They got theirs lowered to the same the other had, but its still not fair, because the other house was twice as large and worth about 30% more. Didn't help that the neighbor with the bigger house and lower taxes had the same last name as one of the county commissioners!
So, I wait to see if the county commissioners force the county auditor to give up the database to the consultant to see who's paying lower taxes than they should be.