dmccarty
Super Star Member
Some talk of Military Industrial Complex & following the money. So something I have pondered: Do helicopters used as troop carriers to carry our soldiers into dangerous places really represent a sound military strategy? America has certainly never won a war since the advent of Air Cav.
It seems our military strategy since 'Nam is to drop our soldiers in places to get shot at. After a few dozen casualties on our side we abandon the position and regroup the survivors to drop them someplace else. To what purpose?
It would seem to be a strategy to use up as much material as possible within some definition of "reasonable" casualties.
...
If the enemy is in the jungle how do you get to them? The enemy certainly watches the very few roads and can easily set up ambushes on any units using said roads. There are trails in the jungles but trails have the same issues as roads. So walk through the jungle? Well that got done but the unit will not move fast and is pretty easily detected. Now you are back to the problem with roads and trails.
With helicopters one can move very fast, much faster than a ground unit moving on foot, and the helicopter unit can travel much greater distances. Helicopters are a big advantage.
Air Cav is just an evolution on paratroopers.
Later,
Dan