RNeumann
Elite Member
One more note- a 200a breaker isn’t very common. They will cost as much as the panel. Price the panel and breakers instead of just the panel.
i dont understand this statement. are you saying you want to feed two separate panels from one breaker? theres no way to get 2-4/0 cables under one lug. maybe im misunderstanding your statementBtw- their is no breaker sizing restrictions with regards to the “down stream” panels. In other words your 200a main breaker can feed two breakers- say 200a to the house and 100a to the shop. No reason to oversized though- it just adds cost and difficulty.
i dont understand this statement. are you saying you want to feed two separate panels from one breaker? theres no way to get 2-4/0 cables under one lug. maybe im misunderstanding your statement
ah..ok i get it now. same thing i was suggesting but with my idea he would replace the 200 amp breaker. your idea adds the new panel in between ...both would work. i personally always remove tho old one because since im pulling a electrical permit anyways, the utility pulls the power off for free, and re-energizes again for free. if theres room next to the existing 200 amp eaton switch, he can add an additional panelI’m not suggesting multiple wires under one lug- I appreciate the follow up to clarify.
So the OP has a 200a service and breaker somewhere in his yard between the house and new shop. I’m suggesting he add a second panel in the yard so he can then “split” the main/service. In the second panel he would have 2 breakers- a 200a going to the house and a 100a going to the shop. Even though the 2 breakers add up to more amps than the main breaker their is no code preventing this- in fact it’s common. I’m sure if you counted up the amps/breakers on your home’s panel this would be the case.
With my recommended solution he doesn’t have to pull the meter or involve the utility.
The comment about 200a breakers was just a word of caution. It’s worth researching because one setup vs another (even the same brand) could cost him hundreds of dollars and a lot of aggravation trying to find a 200a breaker.
One poster suggested a panel that may work- if it had lugs at the bottom of the panel to take the house it could be an economical choice.
no you cannot just add a second one of those. each would be required to be fed from transformer with its own circuit. you could however change your existing 200 amp main breaker with this 200 amp panel with a feed thru 200 amp circuit and 8 space subpanel like this
View attachment 532772
in this case its an eaton panel, about 110 bucks at lowes
with this setup you can feed the 200 thru to house and then run a 100 amp to shop/garage without upgrading service to 400 amps
ah..ok i get it now. same thing i was suggesting but with my idea he would replace the 200 amp breaker. your idea adds the new panel in between ...both would work. i personally always remove tho old one because since im pulling a electrical permit anyways, the utility pulls the power off for free, and re-energizes again for free. if theres room next to the existing 200 amp eaton switch, he can add an additional panel
as you already have a main breaker,,, the panel is already considered a subpanel. this changes nothing.with this design. doesn't this now make the original main panel a sub panel now? so now all the neutrals and grounds need to be on separate bus bars? and the main ground moved to this pass through panel( just learned about pass through lug panels)
its very simple to pull off the old switch and replace it. sometimes you have to extend the feeders, but very rarely do i need to do that.I have one utility that we do everything to avoid and another that is great. Hopefully he (and it sounds like you) has a good one to work with.
And hopefully he has the time to do the meter R&R on the same day- hopefully within a few hours.
Put a 100 or 125 breaker in your existing box.
Then bury conduit to the shop, and put your sub-panel in there as you said.