Tesla pickup, possibly

[/pine]

The volumes of recent discoveries of oil and gas in the US alone...far surpasses all the oil and gas both in reserves and what has been consumed to date world wide...
And it's a good thing because there is no way they are going to be able to use batteries (let alone keep them charged) in a majority of the industrial manufacturing infrastructure and complexes...

Using batteries to charge batteries is a dead end scenario...
What is going to come faster than electric vehicles is oil and gas production and refinery techniques and processes that allow for less and cleaner emissions...so as long as there is fuel there will be ICE powered vehicles...and there is so much unharvested fuel still in the Earth...there will likely be a new energy technology that makes batteries (or even the concept of batteries) obsolete before we run out of oil...there is that much oil left...!

 

[vvanders]

The only problem with that is that the economics won't make sense as battery prices fall. Right now at current gas prices a car that gets 30 MPG currently costs $0.11/mi($3.15/gal here). Our EV on hydro power is $0.02/mi to operate($0.07/kwH). The numbers start looking even worse once you start factoring in maintenance of an ICE powertrain vs EV.

There's still going to be use cases where high density energy is needed, but if you don't fall into one of those categories I can see EVs making a ton of sense to operate.

 

[two_bit_score]

The carbon foot print of batteries is huge even compared to gasoline vehicles. It's likely just a wash at this point on EV's being any 'cleaner' than gasoline powered vehicles.

As technology improves for batteries so will ICE vehicles. Other car makers will beat Tesla in the long run. I'll wait for GM, Ford and the rest to let Tesla make the rookie mistakes and do a much better job on EV's. Of course, like /pine said, there will be more ICE vehicles on the road than EV's for the rest of my life and the lives of my grandchildren. They may be using flying vehicles by then but most likely those wont be battery powered.


.

 

[/pine]

The only problem with that is that the economics won't make sense as battery prices fall. Right now at current gas prices a car that gets 30 MPG currently costs $0.11/mi($3.15/gal here). Our EV on hydro power is $0.02/mi to operate($0.07/kwH). The numbers start looking even worse once you start factoring in maintenance of an ICE powertrain vs EV.

There's still going to be use cases where high density energy is needed, but if you don't fall into one of those categories I can see EVs making a ton of sense to operate.

Yes but only to a limited degree...and only in urban areas...but you must have missed what I said about developing both recovery and refinery techniques and processes that could easily push the cost of gasoline back to under a dollar a gallon...there is way more money being invested in those areas than there is in batteries...rechargeable batteries are not ever going to be the cats meow when it comes to EVs...EVs will not really come into their own until an independent onboard power source is available...and that is where the real money should be invested...not rechargeable batteries...so I really don't see them coming down in cost..in fact they will get more expensive as their range increases mostly due to the high cost of rare earth elements used in both the batteries and the controllers...

 

[bcp]

An "...independent onboard power source..." made me think of this:



Bruce

 

[/pine]

An "...independent onboard power source..." made me think of this:

View attachment 534073

Bruce

I think that model has regen braking too...!

 

[vvanders]

Yes but only to a limited degree...and only in urban areas...but you must have missed what I said about developing both recovery and refinery techniques and processes that could easily push the cost of gasoline back to under a dollar a gallon...there is way more money being invested in those areas than there is in batteries...rechargeable batteries are not ever going to be the cats meow when it comes to EVs...EVs will not really come into their own until an independent onboard power source is available...and that is where the real money should be invested...not rechargeable batteries...so I really don't see them coming down in cost..in fact they will get more expensive as their range increases mostly due to the high cost of rare earth elements used in both the batteries and the controllers...

Urban? Where we're at is pretty darn rural, I've got a 300mi radius plus whatever superchargers are around(7 nearby last time I checked).

Not sure how you think that battery costs are going to increase seeing as both prices have been dropping and capacity has been increasing. The rare earth elements you reference are just a fraction of the total materials, most of the batteries are made up of carbon.

Lets say that they can get gas down to your $1.00/gal in the next 5-10 years. That means that you've just match EV operating costs today, minus maintenance which will be more expensive than an EV.

 

[/pine]

The consumer cost of batteries do not go down unless or until there is something better (at a higher cost) to replace them with...it's the nature of technological consumer goods...

 

[cqaigy2]

The consumer cost of batteries do not go down unless or until there is something better (at a higher cost) to replace them with...it's the nature of technological consumer goods...

Seems like i bought a big screen tv at $1200 and now can have a bigger higher definition one for less the half that price. Or maybe im misunderstanding what you mean by (at a higher cost) or maybe you didn't mean, "it's the nature of technological consumer goods" to mean all tech consumer goods. :confused3:

 

[vvanders]

You're gonna want to cite some of those claims because the li-ion market has been doing pretty much the opposite: Falling lithium-ion battery prices to drive rapid storage uptake – pv magazine USA

Generally tech process improvements tend to compound their improvements(see Moore's law on the transistor side).