Miami pedestrian bridge collapse

[ovrszd]

Yeah that went over my head too. Was it complimentary to /pine and me or the opposite?

I'm sure we will be told shortly.

 

[/pine]

Documents obtained by The Associated Press through a public-records request show that the Florida Department of Transportation in October 2016 ordered Florida International University and its contractors to move one of the bridge's main support structures 11 feet north to the edge of a canal, widening the gap between the crossing's end supports and requiring some new structural design.

Key design change stymied cost, schedule of bridge in deadly Florida collapse | Fox News

 

[bcp]

There are some that try to post useful info and a bunch more that just want to be antagonistic.

antagonistic should mean peaceful:

agonistic

adjective

1.combative; striving to overcome in argument.

 

[/pine]

There are some that try to post useful info....

you mean like this one? :

two = 2

Good work...they should make that post a "sticky"

 

[buckeyefarmer]

"There are 10 kinds of people in the world...those who understand binary and those that don't"

From an old programming class...

11 kinds, those that understand binary, those that dont, those that dont care.

 

[Wnc3]

Here's what I have put together as hypotheses based on what I've read so far. Surely this will be superseded by more accurate information as the picture becomes clearer.

1) I've read the future tower and cables are decorative. The structure as put in place was complete as designed to carry stress.

2) The design is experimental. It is a (theoretical) I-beam. The 'chords' (diagonals containing post-stressing threaded rods) constitute the center one-third of the I-beam.

3) The initial design proposed that the trucks to carry it into place would have platforms on top to distribute stress, and would support the bridge very near its ends as the bridge was carried into place.

4) Due to curbs or something on the street, the truck carrying the North end of the bridge instead carried it some 20 ft from its end, a point not designed for lifting stress. Additionally the platforms in the initial design weren't used between the trucks and the bottom of the bridge. These two factors concentrated stress onto a narrow location not designed to bear lifting force.

5) After it was in place the project engineer, advisor to the contractor, phoned the state DOT and described unexpected cracks.

6) Post-stressing rods, I think in the chords, were found to have less tension than spec. A crew was tightening a chord, I think up on top above that unplanned lift point and 20 out from the North end, when the structure fell.

7) I've seen conjecture that when the bridge was carried 20 ft from its end, the cantilevered last 20 ft stretched the post-tensioning rods in the chords near to breaking. So after the bridge was placed and its ends bore its weight, a rod (more?) was slack. Possibly allowing sag and the crack noticed by the project engineer.

8) The post-tensioning specialty crew was present when the bridge fell. I think up on top tightening a rod back to designed tension. But I think it snapped before it reached spec. Alternately, the crew might have been directed to apply tension to raise the bridge back up to specified height (and close the observed cracks) without regard for the strength of the rod.

9) More conjecture, unverified: I saw a photo of one tensioning rod sticking out of the roof maybe 8 ft, as if it shot out there after snapping. If it were intact it would still be in its crumpled chord. Another photo showed a different (?) post-tensioning rod sticking out of the roof several ft with the hydraulic tightening tool still attached to it. One employee of the post-stress specialty contractor died, two injured. I assume they were operating that tool.

10) A moment after it fell, above the fail point there is an empty man-lift (I think for that crew) and a heavy crane whose hook is empty. I assume the crane is there to lift that hydraulic tool and perhaps to provide hydraulic power. One witness said a heavy object fell from the crane hook causing the collapse. Possibly a trailer-mounted hydraulic pump? That was a student interviewed by tv at the site, this may be real or only what he thought he saw. I would think tensioning a weakened rod, which then snapped, is a more likely cause. Maybe the falling hydraulic lines pulled the hydraulic pump off its crane sling causing the fall that the student witnessed. Pure guessing on my part, later we shall see what really happened.

11) At the moment, I think tightening the pre-stressing rod that had stretched due to overload, caused that rod to snap leaving the bridge without the support that rod was designed to provide. The bridge fell. And there are obviously gross mis-calculations somewhere in the design and install processes given this result.

All this is my opinion. We shall see how close it is to what is found in the final report.

That was really well said and thought out.
I also think when the rod snapped while adding tension and that set off the chain of events.
Thanks for your input.

 

[California]

11 kinds, those that understand binary, those that dont, those that dont care.

What's the fourth?

 

[California]

That was really well said and thought out.
I also think when the rod snapped while adding tension and that set off the chain of events.

Thanks.

 

[dragoneggs]

That was really well said and thought out.
I also think when the rod snapped while adding tension and that set off the chain of events.
Thanks for your input.

I agree. Nice plausible summary of events and cause. I appreciate the think through, Cali! I am a mechanical/structural engineer and haven't had the time to dive into this unfortunate disaster, but it sure seems an avoidable structural failure. Not my livelihood anymore but I would be interested in whether sizing was right or the adjusting was wrong or ???

 

[PILOON]

Not failure related.... but did anyone else notice that almost to a T, as soon as it happened, everyone left their cars and trucks and ran TOWARDS the disaster, most likely wanting to help. Puts a little faith back in humanity.

Yes. saw that and agree with U.

Another thing that struck me is that there were 'cross walks' a mere 100 ft away which suggests 'pork barreling' (think is right term).

Did one get injured jay walking illegally?
Or walking while texting?
Are those students so lazy not to walk 100 ft more to cross safely?