BigBlue1
Veteran Member
I'm not really looking for where the leakage is, my disconnect switch will fix that, and provide a key-less security feature. I'm just wondering why the voltage around "the loop" doesn't match (add up). (It HAS to. Kirchoff's Voltage Law)
I would expect that the resistance of the meter would be high enough so that no current flowed through the meter when I measured the voltage between the battery neg (-) post and the neg (-) cable, with the cable disconnected. I would expect this voltage to be 12.6V. Exactly the same as across the battery posts (12.6V).
But I only measure 11.7V.
So where did the other .9V go?
I wouldn't expect a Voltage Meter to pass that much current through itself. However, if the meter's resistance is low, enough current must flow through it when measuring voltage, that I get a voltage drop (0.9V) across the ATV components from this current. It's the only thing that makes sense, because there doesn't seem to be any other path. This is surprising.
The other 0.9V went into dropping across the resistance of everything else in the circuit between the two voltmeter probes. From the negative battery terminal to the battery plates to the positive terminal to the positive cable to everything else in the closed circuit to the vehicle's ground/frame to the negative cable to the negative cable clamp. All those inches of wire (small resistance) and all the minor resistance at each connection drops the voltage some.
For a simplistic example that demonstrates, go get a 100' extension cable, fashion connection with one of the leads to your (+) battery post and then measure between the (-) battery post and the other end of the extension cord. It won't be the same as the voltage between (+) and (-) posts. Now plug in a couple smaller ext cords and watch voltage drop further, from additional length and each imperfect connection. Same concept applies to your vehicle test.
Rob