sd455dan
Elite Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2012
- Messages
- 4,790
- Location
- North Idaho
- Tractor
- Rhino 554, Ford 550 TLB (JD X500, MTD, Gilson riding mowers) Ford 3000-Sold
That's right. It's a widespread problem because all those millions of engines are not actually measuring the engine temperature, they are measuring the temperature of the fluid circulating in the cooling system.
It's the traditional way to infer engine temperature and nothing wrong with doing it that way, at least so long as there actually is a fluid circulating in the cooling system.
The problem comes about because the type of temperature sensor in common use doesn't have any way to tell if it is measuring fluid temperature or air temperature. So if a leak in the cooling system lets the fluid out, the temperature sensor cannot tell the operator about it. The temperature sensor just reports the temperature of the air sitting in system while just a foot away the lack of coolant cooks the engine.
There are types of temperature sensors that don't have that problem, and other ways to improve the coolant gauge as well - but many manufacturers don't use the better type of sensor and gauge.....although some do.
We improve engines all the time. This is something that needs improving.
My hat's off to the OP for bringing the problem up.
rScotty
Lets add another sensor to the mix that has been on many vehicles for 30 years
Cylinder Head temperature. that does not measure coolant or oil- It measures the metal temperature.
Very common with the aircooled VW crowd.
Plenty of sensors/ senders out there
K type sensors will also work
4 channel k type input hand held digital units can be had for about $30
Last edited: