Hopefully about this time next year I'll have a '67 Mustang coupe in my shop, it's no numbers matching showstopper, hasn't seen the roads in more than a decade... It's currently a 289 headers, cam, Edelbrock manifold and a 4 barrel carb but as well as carbs work I like the turn key set it and forget it of fuel injection... Conveniently I have a '97 Mercury Mountaineer with a 5.0L and more modern automatic just sitting for spare parts, combine that with the disc brake conversion that I already did with Grenada parts a long time ago and hopefully adding power brakes somehow (maybe hydro) I think it should be a nice sleeper/cruiser I imagine the 220hp that the 5.0L makes is more than the cammed 289 makes...
I sure wish they would stop "fixing" things that aren't broken... I bought a '97 Ford Ranger for a daily driver for a reason, sure I'd have more power and better ride with something newer but I know the components of the of this thing, new enough to be OBD II but still has twin I beam suspension up front (roughly 8 fasteners holding the front suspension together), same dashboard that they had through 2011, slightly different seats, only one airbag, only 2 wheels of ABS, twin piston calipers up front, stupid simple and paid off... Modern stuff is cool and all but there's way too many whiz bang gismos. Things started getting too far around 2010, but it would be SWEET if they combined the older simple stuff with the new modern engines and transmissions, a car that weighed 2000lbs less with less useless junk and more legroom would get much better mileage than they do now... A modern silverado 1500 with a 5.3L and however many gears they come with (is it 8 or 10?) with crank windows, two cupholders up front, bench seat with folding center console in the seat, crank windows, single DIN stereo, heater with simple sliders for temperature and a knob for fan speed and two airbags would easily be 1000lb less than the stupid extra junk they add now and probably get 25mpg... I'd probably buy one...