Will 10 Horsepower actually matter on the same size tractor?

   / Will 10 Horsepower actually matter on the same size tractor? #101  
I thought I wanted a 40 horse and ended up with a 60 horse L6060 because I wanted a front mid PTO driven blower and also the bigger loader lift capacity. The extra cash hurt a lot and I smile every time I start the tractor. I did also drive myself wild trying to decide between the “utility” blower and the “commercial” blower. I ended up with the utility since it was rated for 20-60hp and the commercial was rated for 30-80. I figured it would be better to be at the top of the HP rating for the blower rather than the middle. Though I don’t think kubota makes a tractor larger than 60hp with a mid PTO so I don’t know. The PTO rating is approx 50hp.
 
   / Will 10 Horsepower actually matter on the same size tractor? #102  
SNIP.... I personally believe that there is nothing harder to shop for then a tractor. I think buying a piece of heavy equipment like a CAT bulldozer would be easier then this.

When my wife and I were shopping for our last TLB =TractorLoaderBackhoe we looked at everything on the market including commercial JD and CATs (the yellow ones). Not that we could afford one, we just wanted to look. They started around $140K at the time.

So there we were sitting in the cab of a new CAT....me in the operator seat and her on the fold-down "instructor's seat"....and she is looking around in amazement and blurts out, "This cab is nicer than our old living room!".

And she had a point. It also cost a bit more. No, we didn't buy that one...
rScotty
 
   / Will 10 Horsepower actually matter on the same size tractor? #103  
I've never run ags and turfs on similar machines to directly compare. The machine with turfs in the snow had chains, which worked well. Never ran it without the chains. In general turfs stink for anything except not tearing up a lawn.

I did. On the same exact tractor. A 33 hp. For 90% of the work the different tires made no difference in traction. The turfs were a much better ride & more stable on hills. Turfs do suck in deep snow, but we always kept chains on during the winter on any & all light utility tractors regardless of tire type.

We found that turfs plus chain have more traction than bare Ags, but not more than Ags plus chains.
rScotty
 

Attachments

  • N&Rs YM336D.jpg
    N&Rs YM336D.jpg
    624 KB · Views: 107
  • 336D in 2001.JPG
    336D in 2001.JPG
    559.7 KB · Views: 107
   / Will 10 Horsepower actually matter on the same size tractor? #104  
I've never run ags and turfs on similar machines to directly compare. The machine with turfs in the snow had chains, which worked well. Never ran it without the chains. In general turfs stink for anything except not getting traction
Fixed it for you
 
   / Will 10 Horsepower actually matter on the same size tractor? #105  
So there we were sitting in the cab of a new CAT....me in the operator seat and her on the fold-down "instructor's seat"....and she is looking around in amazement and blurts out, "This cab is nicer than our old living room!".

And she had a point. It also cost a bit more. No, we didn't buy that one...
😂
 
   / Will 10 Horsepower actually matter on the same size tractor? #106  
I did. On the same exact tractor. A 33 hp. For 90% of the work the different tires made no difference in traction. The turfs were a much better ride & more stable on hills. Turfs do suck in deep snow, but we always kept chains on during the winter on any & all light utility tractors regardless of tire type.

We found that turfs plus chain have more traction than bare Ags, but not more than Ags plus chains.
rScotty
I have really been considering the turfs but I am concerned that they could get easily punctured if I were to run over something sharp like a bush stump or something. What's your experience with that?
 
   / Will 10 Horsepower actually matter on the same size tractor? #107  
I have really been considering the turfs but I am concerned that they could get easily punctured if I were to run over something sharp like a bush stump or something. What's your experience with that?

Turfs are not very sturdy tires.
 
   / Will 10 Horsepower actually matter on the same size tractor? #108  
I wouldn't take a set of turfs, IF they paid me! lol

SR
 
   / Will 10 Horsepower actually matter on the same size tractor? #110  
Hi all, I wont lie, I am totally new to the tractor world. Very familiar with cars and trucks, not so much on tractors. But, I have been reading articles, posts, and watching videos like crazy for the past 2 months learning what I can as we shop tractors.

Lets take the Kioti NX4510 and NX5510 for example. Both HST. Same basic tractor, 10 more HP. Otherwise between the 2, its larger (wider) tires, and a better 3 pt hitch, thats it I think.

So does 10 Hp matter, say your using a decent sized PTO Snowblower in what the town plows leave behind after a 12" snow fall, is that 10 Hp noticeable?

What about if your just pushing snow around with a pusher box, will the extra HP and TQ help?

Is there other benefits of more HP other than running the PTO?

Have you ever in your 35 or 40 Hp tractor, wished you had 45 or 50 Hp?

Curious to hear everyone's opinions, thank you!
There are a ton of folks here with the same comments, mostly that reflect “going bigger” on HP is usually the the wisest choice.

I was in your exact position 2 years ago. A newbie with NO tractor experience and questioning HP and Frame size.

My main goal was to NOT be unhappy with either my frame or HP choice 2 or fewer years down the road after some experience in the seat.

I knew I wanted to finish mow… which was basically placing a top end on frame size. So I maxed that out. I have found in 1.5 years that I’m on the heavy end of that limit and do some minimal damage every time I finish mow with a 72” finish mower on the 3 point.

Having said that… that single issue is the only negative for hitting the largest frame size I could possibly go and still be able to finish mow due to tractor weight and width. (Although there is still a negative in locking me out of smaller lots that I just can’t justify using the tractor on -but again for my properties it’s working.

Next, onto HP.

My initial choice was aKubota L2501… that’s what I knew I could safely finish mow just about anything with and still have something left to do satisfying work with a small backhoe, FEL, and a few implements. I didn’t see much in the way of ground based implements (bottom plows) in my future so I opted for lighter (smaller frame size) and sans emissions (25 or below).

Having been told that I should always go a frame size higher, after the L2501 I moved up a full frame size to the Kubota MX4800 open station. A massive move/change and added limitation for finish mowing, probably too big, but I didn’t want to short myself on other more weight based activities like the size of the FEL and Backhoe. So I opted to upsize at the cost of smaller lot size issues for the finish mower. The HP of approximately 50 compared to 25 for the smaller frame size had no impact on my choice. It was just the frame size alone that kicked me up into the higher HP (doubled).

The day I signed the paperwork I decided to sit in a grand L3560. I liked it. I liked the comfort, I liked the roominess, and I liked that it was about the same frame size as the MX4800 but with a cab, and a ton of features that would required much less of a training curve to get comfortable with the equipment.

So now I was basically up to the extreme max of finish mowing on the frame size of the Kubota L3560, and although I did have a 40 and a 60 HP option… I opted for the 35 HP for a number of reasons:

I wasn’t looking at major ground contact work.
PTO requirements were only finish mowing and possibly tilling/brush hog work. So I could give up a bit of HP to keep from growing the frame size a small amount yet again to step into a 40 or 60HP L4060 or L6060 (which would have definitely pushed me out of the finish mowing arena as far as frame size!)

Since mostly the backhoe and FEL work and finish mowing was my gig, I stuck with the L3560.

Today… if I had the choice again, I would have taken the L4060 just to have some HP overhead available as an “in case” option.

But that model wasn’t available with cab in a “limited edition” that saved me about $2500 over the regular version of the same tractor…. So I made the best possible choice for me, at the time, and with the biggest possible frame size that would fit my needs.

The HP didn’t take as much of the decision process over the other factors based on my expectations of future use (minimal ground contact and extended FEL and backhoe use). I did get the largest BH and FEL available for the model of choice, and I’m completely happy with the experience of the equip going on 1.5 years and almost 450 hours.
Good luck!!
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2017 Ram 5500 Valve Placer Bucket Truck with Versalift STP36NE - 41FT Working Height, Low Miles (A51039)
2017 Ram 5500...
2015 FORD F-250XL SUPER DUTY SERVICE TRUCK (A51406)
2015 FORD F-250XL...
2019 Bobcat E32i Mini Excavator (A50322)
2019 Bobcat E32i...
71057 (A49346)
71057 (A49346)
Landoll (A50657)
Landoll (A50657)
2017 Ford F-450 Crew Cab Mason Dump Truck (A50323)
2017 Ford F-450...
 
Top