MossRoad
Super Moderator
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2001
- Messages
- 60,320
- Location
- South Bend, Indiana (near)
- Tractor
- Power Trac PT425 2001 Model Year
That's true. If you don't own that land, you have no control over it. That's a known factor going into the deal. Same as renting a house or apartment; you might not have a place to live next year. No one expects it, but if the owner sells it, or raises the rent higher than you can afford, you're out. Same thing with hunting and fishing lands. One owner will allow you, the next may not.This is close to being reality for my area. Just over the border in NY there is a large swath of available farm land in the solar panel program. The town is pushing hard because they want the tax dollars. Broke down like this $4000 to be in the program, IF they build $800/acre/year. I also am at risk of losing a field. A 50 acre chunk of hay ground that I rent. I also live in NWPA where we are happy WHEN the sun shines. All NY is waiting is a few pen strokes. What I have heard is substations are planned and ready to go. The issue is these companies just want an easy build. Large plots of ground they can destroy and guess what large plots are utilized for.........lots of ag production. To address the farmer has a right to do what they want is correct IF they own the land. The issue is these farm (my area) only own so much and rent a large portion of their ground so they don't have control and it can severely impact their operations if the landowner of ground they rent turn it into a solar panel waste land.
The rumor is once the panels go in this becomes sheep country.
About the only thing you can do to control it is to purchase the land yourself. And, that's more often than not, very hard or fiscally impossible to do. You're at the mercy of the owner.
What I like about the planned solar project west of us is that the land owners are leasing the property to the solar company, not selling it. So they retain it in their family. After X years, the solar company has the option to pull out (literally. they have to remove the equipment if they leave), or renew for more years. So it's a 20-30 year experiment to see if it's viable or not. While the solar installation sits there, the land rests. No tillage means no wind erosion and actually soil building. No fertilizers to runoff as corn and beans did. No water usage from irrigation, so the aquifer replenishes through rainfall. No fossil fuel usage for tilling or harvesting. That's a bunch of expenses the farmer won't incur, plus the time savings. They can just sit there and collect the rent if they want, but I'd guess most farmers can't sit for long, so they'll pick up jobs and collect double income.
We'll see how it goes.