Just another junk chainsaw

[xyz123]

Pics shown of a stihl 363 that been shipped over to US.
Is supposed to be carbed version of the new 400. But thats where it stops.

Stihl 363 open port cylinder and piston pics.

Then compared to the new 400 if recall right.

 

[xyz123]

Just saving in case someone else needs to know where tank vent and lines on clone or oem 2511 is.

 

[xyz123]

To go with above

 

[xyz123]

Cleaning the echo 3510 I rebuilt carb on to give to dad for a gift.

Found a security tag on it still.

 

[xyz123]

Checking out the neojunk clone H side carb for 3120. Never put it on saw and pump diaphragm feels like one I would replace when stiff.

Reason why a bunch of us swore off on this clone maker. They are way behind.

Farmertec non H carb works great. These neojunk ones are hit and miss.

 

[xyz123]

No wonder folks have issues with neojunk clone carbs. Brand new carb and the diaphragm is stiff from get go.

Never had mix across it or installed yet.

It’s not even close to being pliable for pumping like Tillotson kit.

Inside round metal piece was bent alittle too.

 

[xyz123]

neojunk 3120 8120 carb kit in their H carbs are horrible. I swear the pump dia in this is double the thickness and and stiff like a kit been run on emix

Just smh again this morning checking out the kit the new carb came with.

 

[xyz123]

Overseas testing emissions on some newer saws.

Emission numbers of some saws I seen posted. =

Appears that the 564 XP uses clean air ports to “stratify” the scavenging mixture, just like in “strato” chainsaws with carburetors. According to data from the EPA, HC+NOₓ (or CO) emissions are comparable to those of “strato” saws equipped with carbs and better than those of the 500i.

HC+NOₓ[g/kWh]
564: 59.5
562: 62
7310: 55.6
572: 55.1
500i: 68.5

CO [g/kWh]
564: 252
562: 299
7310: 317
572: 225
500i: 406

CO₂ [g/kWh] EPA/spec sheet
564: 791/762
562: 763/778
7310: 749/743
572: 808/841
500i: 732/706