1430 mini-hoe (Lackender vs PT)

   / 1430 mini-hoe (Lackender vs PT) #11  
I think RegL just made the decision easy for you.

I will say there is no way I can lift the Lackender mini hoe.

Ken
 
   / 1430 mini-hoe (Lackender vs PT) #12  
IrTxRx said:
Bob,

Would it be correct to assume that the lower and lower you go the harder and harder it gets to excavate with either brand. but the longer boom of the lackender lets it get difficult after 4-5 ft instead of 2-3 ft???

This particular project is a one time deal...after that I cannot see needing to dig any 4ft holes. Right now the project is planned to be done with a shovel or renting the smallest tracked excavator we can find.

Thanks
I have no experience with the Lackender hoe so I can't offer a comparison.

I would characterize the difficulty of digging deeper as having two factors:
1. Reach--with the PT hoe to get down to 3.5 feet the hoe needs to be nearly verticle and the bucket extended;
1. In my soils the shale generally gets harder the deeper I go--hence more difficult digging but in this situation you want the hoe more nearly vertical with excellent breakout force from the cylinder on the hoe because the PT is relatively light for use with a backhoe and has no outriggers to stabilize it. If you use the cylinder with the hoe extended out horizontal it tends to pull the machine around.
 
   / 1430 mini-hoe (Lackender vs PT)
  • Thread Starter
#13  
ksimolo said:
I think RegL just made the decision easy for you.

I will say there is no way I can lift the Lackender mini hoe.

Ken


BTW -- how does one get a +/- 500# attachment on and off the PT attachment plate when it is lying sideways on the ground?

Rip -- did you find it a useful tool with the thumb, or really to big for the #1200 series?
 
   / 1430 mini-hoe (Lackender vs PT) #14  
So, I have used my Back Hoe a bit. Mixed environment. Some digging, some thumb work. In my head it is all brilliant. I would love the thumb to be Hydraulic, and would love to have a true backhoe but that is not in the cards...So this works fine.

I bought this first and foremost because of Ken Simolo. I hold his research level and intelligence in high regards and when he said this is what he was doing I followed like a puppy.

In my head there were a few nice things.. The Lackender is beefy as all get out. PT's looked a little thin. Lacks is heavier, but that is no real deal breaker. I am not trying to lift that heavy of stuff. And the cylinder for the dig part was stouter than PTs.

I have broken the PT over the Hoe. lackenders is long. And even fully up you have to be careful not to put the bucket all the way down cause it will catch... Like this /\... Anyway, I was tooling around the property, decided to go up a steep embankment and POW. Like a gunshot. Caught the head of the bucket on the ridge. I broke the upper ball joint that attaches to my tilt plate. Went to the shop and had a new one welded on for $40 all in...

I think it was JJ who mentioned that the digging force on the hoe is more a function of the scooping than the down force. I can attest to that.

My soil is clay, few rocks....

This video is of my wife using the hoe for the first time. As JJ pointed out she is trying to dig with the arm and not with the head.

Finally, the hoe is a PITA without the mods to the locking lever. If you have a bad back it will scream at you after a day with the hoe...

I also bought the boom attachment from Lackender. In the photo it has my Blackberry rake that broke immediately. But you can see the reach is phenomenal. It is a bit of a pain to take the bucket off then bolt this on, but it still does what it is supposed to....

Video of the wife at work

YouTube - back hoe
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0471_23.JPG
    IMG_0471_23.JPG
    178.8 KB · Views: 215
  • IMG_0472_22.JPG
    IMG_0472_22.JPG
    177 KB · Views: 208
  • IMG_4496.JPG
    IMG_4496.JPG
    745.3 KB · Views: 211
   / 1430 mini-hoe (Lackender vs PT) #15  
Good grief! You can work in the next county with that thing. :eek:
 
   / 1430 mini-hoe (Lackender vs PT) #16  
Thanks for posting that video. That's the first time I have seen a mini hoe of any type in action. It looks like it is a lot slower operation than I had anticipated.
 
   / 1430 mini-hoe (Lackender vs PT) #17  
Well, it is my wife operating it for the first time... But, IMO, it is slower than a real backhoe. Using the control at your knee to manipulate the bucket is a real PITA. It is going to be one of my winter mods...

As I got more used to it this fall the projects went faster and faster..

Carl
 
   / 1430 mini-hoe (Lackender vs PT) #18  
I have a 1430 with PT minihoe and have dug probably 3 or 4 hundred feet of trenches for drain or water lines. Our property is heavily rocked and I have pulled out some up to six or eight hundred pounds with the minihoe and thumb. While the minihoe is my favorite attachment I would like it to be longer. There is really no way to dig a four foot trench unless you are right on top of it and it is reaching full down exerting no real digging effort. Fortunately I have never found it necessary to go that deep.
From viewing the Lackender video I would like the added reach but I would be troubled by the lack of visibility around the attachment plate. It is hard enough to see around the PT plate to where you are trying to dig without adding the big lackender plate as an additional obstruction.
The visibility is really the downside of the PT minihoe. I compare this to a small mini excavator that I rented to clean out a creek and I would say the reach and visiblity of the excavator made it so much easier to use than the minihoe that I would always go for the excavator at $250 per day for anything that will require more than a few hours of work for the minihoe.
 
   / 1430 mini-hoe (Lackender vs PT) #19  
I definitely agree. I went to Tazewell expecting to buy a mini-hoe, but watching an expert dig a 6"x6"x10' ditch in about three minutes with one was not impressive- especially since the trencher cut a 6"x36"x10' trench in the same time.

That said, I have found a few things where a minihoe would have been useful, but for my uses not enough to make it worthwhile. It all depends on your particular conditions.

All the best,

Peter

SnowRidge said:
Thanks for posting that video. That's the first time I have seen a mini hoe of any type in action. It looks like it is a lot slower operation than I had anticipated.
 
   / 1430 mini-hoe (Lackender vs PT) #20  
hmmm... trencher..... sounds good. I so want one, it and a Stump Grinder are the two things on top of my list to get (along with a sprayer)....
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

KMC 3376 LOT NUMBER 265 (A53084)
KMC 3376 LOT...
(1) 14ft Tarter Gate (A51573)
(1) 14ft Tarter...
2004 Hydraulic Breaker Excavator Attachment (A52377)
2004 Hydraulic...
EVERYTHING SOLD AS-IS WHERE IS!! (A50775)
EVERYTHING SOLD...
New/Unused 7ft Stainless Steel Work Bench with 10 Drawers (A51573)
New/Unused 7ft...
2018 JOHN DEERE 160G LC EXCAVATOR (A51246)
2018 JOHN DEERE...
 
Top