1914 Vs B7500

   / 1914 Vs B7500 #1  

RickeyL

New member
Joined
May 19, 2003
Messages
20
Location
Central Iowa
Can't say as I completely understand Full Synchromesh w/Mechanical Shuttle on the 1914..... plan on using a loader a lot. Can someone explain the trany on the 1914.... think I'm a Hydro type of guy since my lawn mowers have been that way. The 1914 seems about the same size as the Kubota b7500 and I have sat on it and it seems about the right size for me.... I need the manueverability because of all the trees and clean up.... also have some very steep areas to contend with that I need to know I can climb.... can anyone help?
/forums/images/graemlins/ooo.gifRick
 
   / 1914 Vs B7500 #2  
The Hydro is the only way to go for FEL usage. Pickup and move a load without having to shift a thing; just pivot your foot. My B7500 excels on hills and is very manuverable since I don't concern myself with shifting. I also like the way it comes to a complete stop when I let off the accelerator. I also have very steep hills. Loaded the tires and set them wide for added stability.

Hydro costs more up front but will have a better resale value. As a matter of fact, I would expect to recover all the added cost of a hydro on resale. I would think all future compacts will be hydro.

Ken
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

Towable arrow board (A55973)
Towable arrow...
2015 Chevrolet Traverse LS SUV (A56859)
2015 Chevrolet...
2003 International 4300 Cab and Chassis Truck (A55852)
2003 International...
HIGH END MINI GOLF CART (A58214)
HIGH END MINI GOLF...
2022 Coras Predator Steel End Dump Trailer (A55315)
2022 Coras...
2020 MACK GRANITE (A58214)
2020 MACK GRANITE...
 
Top