1914 Vs B7500

   / 1914 Vs B7500 #1  

RickeyL

New member
Joined
May 19, 2003
Messages
20
Location
Central Iowa
Can't say as I completely understand Full Synchromesh w/Mechanical Shuttle on the 1914..... plan on using a loader a lot. Can someone explain the trany on the 1914.... think I'm a Hydro type of guy since my lawn mowers have been that way. The 1914 seems about the same size as the Kubota b7500 and I have sat on it and it seems about the right size for me.... I need the manueverability because of all the trees and clean up.... also have some very steep areas to contend with that I need to know I can climb.... can anyone help?
/forums/images/graemlins/ooo.gifRick
 
   / 1914 Vs B7500 #2  
The Hydro is the only way to go for FEL usage. Pickup and move a load without having to shift a thing; just pivot your foot. My B7500 excels on hills and is very manuverable since I don't concern myself with shifting. I also like the way it comes to a complete stop when I let off the accelerator. I also have very steep hills. Loaded the tires and set them wide for added stability.

Hydro costs more up front but will have a better resale value. As a matter of fact, I would expect to recover all the added cost of a hydro on resale. I would think all future compacts will be hydro.

Ken
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

NIPPON HYD THUMB (A52706)
NIPPON HYD THUMB...
2007 Amkus Rescue System (A56857)
2007 Amkus Rescue...
3ft Metal 5-Point Star Art (A55853)
3ft Metal 5-Point...
2016 MACK CXU613 MID-ROOF SLEEPER (A58214)
2016 MACK CXU613...
2015 Ford F-350 4x4 Ext. Cab Liberator 3,200LB 1.5 Ton Crane Mechanics Truck (A55973)
2015 Ford F-350...
ST205/75R15 Trailer Tires (A55788)
ST205/75R15...
 
Top