2Malamutes
Bronze Member
PCABE5 said:Possibly. The engine was designed for a rated power output at 3000rpm. That being said power and economy should be at that rpm which it was operationally designed to operate at. Would be hard to believe the Japanese and JD had designed the tractor to be the least efficient at its rated rpm where only its load determines the FC and where it will see the most operational hours. Running it at 3000rpm is better and will do less harm than anyone letting a diesel idle for any lenght of time. Also, PTO isn't the only function on the tractor that is designed to operate at the rated rpm. Some think that 3000 rpm is the limit of this engine but it is JD's required limit as the same engine in other applications have over 3500+rpm ratings.
I think you are reading too much into my wording. I stand by my statement that WOT is the greatest fuel consumption irrespective of fuel efficiency, which is what you seem to be referring to. I vary the RPM based on the task at hand. Under load I generally run near the rated 3000 RPM as I assume that is where the engine has the best balance of consumption and power (and thus the greatest efficiency). When not under load I don't always run at 3000 RPM, as I would rather have the lower consumption even if there is a trade-off in terms of power vs. consumption (since I'm not under load I'm not too concerned about the power portion of the equation.) There is a reason other than noise violations that you don't pull into a truck stop at night and hear dozens of diesels idling at WOT.