24 horse tractor... what do you think?

[KiotiJohn]

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( I would agree that with NO ballast added, the CK20 would be more stable than the TC24 because the CK20 is heavier, but with proper ballast the TC24 would more than equal a properly ballasted CK20 and have more available PTO hp for larger implements. )</font>
Probably would Bob. The NH loader is a goodie. I'm just happy not to have to bother changing implements or adding weights to get ballast except when the load is going to be really heavy. John

 

[frank_f15]

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( So the knawing question is, Are New Holland loaders (class I and II) overbuilt for the size of the tractor they are mounted to? ....and.... Are Kubota (B series) loaders underbuilt for the size of tractor they are mounted to?
)</font>
DON: i have often pondered this same question /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif. ont only in regargs to the 2 u mentioned but all tractors. seems to me u would not want a super loader capacity if the tractor was not designed to handel such a load.