Ray_Fort_White
Bronze Member
Seems to me that my 3038E burns about a gallon an hour at 2500 rpm while mowing @ about 2 acres an hour. It burns less when doing loader work.
I also wondered about the convenience of filling the gas tank. Maybe using 2 gallon diesel containers might prevent overfill.
How long can you go on a load of fuel with the 6 gallon tank?
Tim
Have been checking out these models and can't figure out a couple of options on them... hoping someone can help:
1. I believe they're identical in size, including tire dimensions. Correct?
2. Can you get power beyond? i.e. to run a log splitter?
3. The brochure states it can take a front plow blade - but I can't find an option for the frame-mount variety. Is the only option the quick-attach Frontier model? If so, should I be more confident in the 305 loader torsional rigidity compared with the 300x/300cx arms? I've heard that loader-mounted blades can bend the arms. But perhaps the 305 permanent mount is stronger?
4. Can you add an optional FEL loader joystick that's more like the other 3000-series tractors? I know you can do that on a Kubota B2630/3030 model... I have a torn rotator cuff in my right shoulder that makes reaching out uncomfortable - but, reaching down for the loader joystick just fine.
5. Can you upgrade the seat like the 2000-series?
6. How does the diff-lock work with the brake pedal?
7. Finally... are the height dimensions the same for ag/industrial/turf tires? I ask because I have a 7' garage door and want ag's, but the wheel size seems much larger in pictures compared with the turf and industrial size wheels... the brochure doesn't help. Only says 83".
Thanks!
The manual suggests the diff lock will automatically disengage when the tires no longer are experiencing slip.
This is slightly off topic from the original poster's questions, but the engine tuning of the 3032E and 3038E shows some rather interesting ramifications. In the case of the 3032E as compared to the 3320's version of the engine, limiting operating rpm to 2500 rpm and raising the compression ratio to 19 increases operating torque slightly (from 61.6 to around 62.7 ft-lbs), moves the torque peak up to 1680 rpm from 1560, and most dramatically increases the peak torque by 10% (from 73.9 to 80.2 ft-lbs) and the torque rise from 20% in 1.64L version in the 3320, to 28% in its 3032E guise.
This is interesting to me given the light weight of the 3032E and 3038E. For one thing, both tractors would seem very likely to spin the wheels given the improved torque numbers, and unless one really needs 30 PTO hp, the spinning might be a real issue with the 3038E.
It is also interesting that having a higher torque peak and torque rise may help performance under load, but if the torque peak comes at a higher rpm value, it may be theoretically easier to stall the tractor under an extreme load that pushes the engine below the higher rpm torque peak. Makes me wonder about these two for loader operations. For 3 pt activies like bushhogging, they might be great little machines, perhaps even a bit better than the 3320/3520 versions of the engines.
I'd be very interested in what users of these are reporting as far as performance.
Tim