5030:
Theoretically, i just dont agree. If the load is between the outriggers there wont be torsion in the length axis of the tractor...
Practically spoken, i agree with you very much because when you can break a top link, you'd better be thinking of what forces you're playing with... /forums/images/graemlins/blush.gif
Last winter i've built my own subframe for a used loader i bought, which is now mounted on a Zetor 5245. I'm still not done as i'm adding paralel linkage (self levelling) to it, and with a better oil pump on my tractor as well, i must be able to upgrade it to 1300 kg lifting force, to handle allmost anything on the farm, with bucket, bale spike, pallet forks, manbucket.
(And a grapple rake which will probably have to wait till next winter before i've got time... ) /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
With some serious lift on a relatively small tractor there are quite some forces on it.
I've seen enough pictures of "articulated" tractors on the internet that broke right behin the clutch housing, where it is most narrow. I have built a frame fully extending to the rear axle, with a future backhoe attachment kept in mind.
I attached a picture of my frame
Just look at truck mounted cranes, their subframes are sometimes 3 times as strong.
I worked at a railway construction machinery workshop. They had 2 Renault trucks that could also work on railroad wheels. Both these trucks had bent and cracked frames, because the rail wheels (hydraulic lowered) were mounted on front and back of the truck, the bend force on the frame was more than when the weight was on the normal 4 road axles. /forums/images/graemlins/blush.gif /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
Using something for a duty it wasnt designed for allways needs extra engineering caution