Re: 419 vs. 300? Dealers pullin\' one on me?
Thanks, I thought I should be getting the 300 also, just as to not be buying an obsolete piece.
I'm not sure I'd call the 419 Loader obsolete. However, the 300 does have quite a bit more capacity at the maximum lift height (which is about the same as the 419 loader).
Realistically speaking...how often are you going to lift 610 lbs (419) or 740 lbs (300 FEL) to 88" as a residential owner?
(edited comment): Now, does the new 790 have a new hydraulic pump to go with that new loader? Guess I must look that up in the Deere site.
Looked it up...no change in the Hydraulic specs from the older 790's. Now, where did Deere come up with that higher lift capacity? Is it in bigger cylinders or just a more robust design of the 300 loader?
Just to let you know, for my work, the 419 does fine. I just have to figure out how Deere rated the 300 loader higher.
So, we're playing the specs game here, I think.
As far as resale, I don't believe the early 790's with the #70 loader took a big hit on resale when the 419 was introduced. I don't expect the 419 equipped 790's will take a hit either.
After the first 3 to 5 years, it sure seems like used tractor prices stabilize. However, we're seeing a lot more CUT's sold then there was 5 years ago. I do expect used (especially sold by private sales) prices to drop (as a percentage of the price when new) simply because there are more used CUT's on the market.