4WD variations.?

   / 4WD variations.? #21  
My understanding or maybe misunderstanding of what constituted 4 wheel drive versus 4 wheel assist is that if it has a driveshaft to the front wheels then it was 4 wheel drive. If it had hydraulic motors assisting the front wheels, then it was that 4 wheel assist. Wheel size is not an issue

That's correct. Deere made a lot of tractors with "front wheel assist" which was a hydraulicly powered motor at each front wheel to "assist" with traction at the front axle. It is not a true, mechanical driven front driveshaft from a center transfer case. It was limited in how much power it could deliver to the front wheels, so it was named "assist" rather than "drive".
 
   / 4WD variations.? #22  
Originally Posted by Gary Fowler

"My understanding or maybe misunderstanding of what constituted 4 wheel drive versus 4 wheel assist is that if it has a driveshaft to the front wheels then it was 4 wheel drive. If it had hydraulic motors assisting the front wheels, then it was that 4 wheel assist. Wheel size is not an issue"

That's correct. Deere made a lot of tractors with "front wheel assist" which was a hydraulicly powered motor at each front wheel to "assist" with traction at the front axle. It is not a true, mechanical driven front driveshaft from a center transfer case. It was limited in how much power it could deliver to the front wheels, so it was named "assist" rather than "drive".

That makes it pretty darned clear. Thanks guys.

That distinction (4wd vs assist) was a "convention" to simplify terminology like calling the big metal things that burn gas (or electricity or wood or...) and get real hot on top to cook food "a stove." Worked well.

Anybody know of a CUT with assist?

Many of us will be relieved to know the 4wd tractors we were sold as 4wd tractors and have the same or similar 4wd as our 4wd pickups are in fact (drum roll please) 4wd. Wow what a relief!

Now does anyone care to explain as clearly as the above two quotes just what if any problem there is with Kubota's bevel gear drive? Except for the nearly violent hobby horsing when turned sharply.

Pat

Pat
 
   / 4WD variations.? #23  
What is the big deal about full power at all steering angles with a tractor? Full power and traction is typically needed when pulling a plow which is generally in a straight line or when loading the FEL bucket which is also a straightahead direction. When do you need full power/traction while turning hard with a tractor?

Seems to me this is just a marketing gimick.
Suppose you need to go forward while turning and the fronts are sunk in a bit. How about climbimg over a log at full lock. How about trying to steer when pushing and lifting a load. ? Many times it would be helpful to significantly overdrive the fronts when trying to turn hard. Full pull power is always good to have ready at the front. All 4WAs have this. Most arent quite as healthy at as high turn angles as Kubuta can do. The power transmission on them is not the least affected by turn angle. Most tractors tho are limited by wheel turning clearance prior to turn angles where a kubota type system is needed. The very good thing about them on small tractors is good front axle ground clearance.
larry
 
   / 4WD variations.? #24  
Originally Posted by IslandTractor

"What is the big deal about full power at all steering angles with a tractor? Full power and traction is typically needed when pulling a plow which is generally in a straight line or when loading the FEL bucket which is also a straightahead direction. When do you need full power/traction while turning hard with a tractor?

Seems to me this is just a marketing gimick."

I agree that full power in 4wd is a good thing for plowing. When it comes to plowing I have a sub soiler and a middle buster that I virtually never use (and no other plows.)

I find the ability to use full power with the steering turned the max is very useful when using my box blade. For the size of my tractor (39 PTO HP), I have a large heavy box blade. It is a 6 ft box, weighs well over a thousand pounds, and has hydraulic raise and lower scarifiers. It has high sides and holds a lot of dirt when full so is very heavy. I frequently end up in low gear with max throttle when moving the max amount of dirt. Not being able to turn as sharply as possible and or use full power while doing it would really detract from performance.

Surely I am not unique in using full power and full steering deflection simultaneously. I suppose it to be a common practice with folks whose tractors can do it and actually WORK their tractors. Sure there are folks who may have never had the capability so they don't know what they are missing or their tractor is really a lawn mower, or whatever.

Pat
 
   / 4WD variations.? #25  
Surely I am not unique in using full power and full steering deflection simultaneously. I suppose it to be a common practice with folks whose tractors can do it and actually WORK their tractors. Sure there are folks who may have never had the capability so they don't know what they are missing or their tractor is really a lawn mower, or whatever.

Pat

If real tractor users depend so much on 4wd at full steering deflection how is that only Kubota offers this feature and how did anyone manage before it was available? It still seems like marketing hype to me.
 
   / 4WD variations.? #26  
If real tractor users depend so much on 4wd at full steering deflection how is that only Kubota offers this feature and how did anyone manage before it was available? It still seems like marketing hype to me.
Theres no magic to kubotas setup. I thot I said that. You can call it hype, but in truth it offers a small advantage at very hard turn angles - harder than most tractors, kubotas included, are capable of. To repeat - all 4wd tractors offer full power at the fronts when turning. People who use their tractors for a large variety of tasks frequently benefit from this.
larry
 
   / 4WD variations.? #27  
Theres no magic to kubotas setup. I thot I said that. You can call it hype, but in truth it offers a small advantage at very hard turn angles - harder than most tractors, kubotas included, are capable of. To repeat - all 4wd tractors offer full power at the fronts when turning. People who use their tractors for a large variety of tasks frequently benefit from this.
larry

Got it. (This time:eek:)
 
   / 4WD variations.? #28  
I was out this morning brush hogging in the dark by headlights. Some of the terrain was real craters of the moon type stuff. I could have done everything I did with less power in 4wd at full steering deflection maneuvering up hills dodging dirt lumps between eroded places BUT... would have had to back and fill and jocky around if I couldn't use 4wd at high power with full steering deflection.

Over time, improvements to the general state of the practice are more often incremental, evolutionary rather than revolutionary. Someone always has to be first with a beneficial feature. It isa like a spontaneous mutation in the natural world. If it is a disadvantage that lowers survival rates then it will not stay long. If the change is a benefit then it will probably survive and perhaps spread.

To assume having a desirable feature is just hype is not very generous nor likely accurate. No doubt the marketing types do sing the praises of anything that tends to differentiate their brand from another but the engineers probably did not add in this design feature just to be different and arm the marketeers with material for disllcussion.

Maybe it isn't new, improved, and lemon scented but it works for me and I am glad I have it. Speculating that it is pure marketing hype with no facts in evidence smacks of sour grapes.

Pat
 
   / 4WD variations.? #29  
Maybe it isn't new, improved, and lemon scented but it works for me and I am glad I have it. Speculating that it is pure marketing hype with no facts in evidence smacks of sour grapes.

Pat

I appreciate your point but the inverse is equally true. Speculating that it is anything but marketing hype without evidence seems just to accept whatever the marketing guys tell us. I don't get stuck trying to turn with my Kioti. I assume most JD tractors don't have trouble turning in 4wd either. Where is the evidence that the Kubota feature is a meaningful improvement?
 
   / 4WD variations.? #30  
I appreciate your point but the inverse is equally true. Speculating that it is anything but marketing hype without evidence seems just to accept whatever the marketing guys tell us. I don't get stuck trying to turn with my Kioti. I assume most JD tractors don't have trouble turning in 4wd either. Where is the evidence that the Kubota feature is a meaningful improvement?

I guess just on the face of it I have difficulty thinking that being able to apply more power in 4wd while turning sharply is a bad thing. Why isn't more better in this case?

If folks have a hard time grasping that then I suggest two guys conveniently close together, one with a Kubota and one with the other style should take turns hooking onto the same big heavy box blade of dirt and making doughnuts. Maybe there won't be enough difference to warrant anyone getting their panties in a bunch because they don't have the Kubota feature. Maybe there is a significant difference. Maybe Kubota does worse, who knows. On the surface I can't imagine better full power hard turns to be a bad thing. I do know that I frequently make full power sharp turns under significant load and I wouldn't want to settle for less capability than I have.

Pat
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2004 FORD F-650 SUPER DUTY DUMP TRUCK (A51406)
2004 FORD F-650...
4K SAND SEPARATOR (A52472)
4K SAND SEPARATOR...
GENIE MAN LIFT (A52472)
GENIE MAN LIFT...
LIKE NEW 2023 Rhino 84in Reverse Rotation Rotary Tiller (A53472)
LIKE NEW 2023...
2015 PETERBILT 567 TRI-AXLE (A52472)
2015 PETERBILT 567...
WOODS DHS48N LOT NUMBER 75 (A53084)
WOODS DHS48N LOT...
 
Top