MChalkley
Elite Member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2000
- Messages
- 3,198
- Location
- Eastern Virginia
- Tractor
- EarthForce EF-5 mini-TLB (2001)
Trvler - Your experience is interesting. Also, quite puzzling, since it is completely opposite to every documented fleet test I've ever seen. The only difference I can see between your test and the ones I know of is that yours was done using Mobil 1 and the ones I'm familiar with were done using Amsoil. And I wouldn't have thought there would be much difference between those two synthetics. Amsoil has always said theirs is a lot better and given a lot of what I considered "mumbo-jumbo" to explain why, but I never believed it. Maybe your experience, when compared with all the fleets that have run similar tests using Amsoil as the synthetic, proves Amsoil is a better synthetic. As I say, your results are interesting.
What I said earlier is still true from my own usage in half a dozen different vehicles. I break even using synthetic just on fuel savings. When I factor in extended change intervals, I'm saving money. And again, as I say, I believe there's a direct correlation between reduced friction and extending equipment life, so there's a payoff there, if I use the equipment long enough to benefit from it.
You mention synthetic's superiority in extreme conditions. That's what I call a safety net. Under certain conditions, when something goes wrong, if you're using petroleum, your engine's toast, but if you're using synthetic, it lives. That's enough for me. Everybody else can make their own call, with no fear of getting the hairy eyeball from me. Shucks, I even have a few friends that never keep anything longer than a year or two, just so they don't have to worry about maintenance. And I still speak to them.
Mark
What I said earlier is still true from my own usage in half a dozen different vehicles. I break even using synthetic just on fuel savings. When I factor in extended change intervals, I'm saving money. And again, as I say, I believe there's a direct correlation between reduced friction and extending equipment life, so there's a payoff there, if I use the equipment long enough to benefit from it.
You mention synthetic's superiority in extreme conditions. That's what I call a safety net. Under certain conditions, when something goes wrong, if you're using petroleum, your engine's toast, but if you're using synthetic, it lives. That's enough for me. Everybody else can make their own call, with no fear of getting the hairy eyeball from me. Shucks, I even have a few friends that never keep anything longer than a year or two, just so they don't have to worry about maintenance. And I still speak to them.
Mark