5035 Questions

   / 5035 Questions #11  
Since HP is a calculated figure derived from the torque and RPM relationship you can calculate it out for any given HP rating, or figure any of the values as long as you have the other two.

HP=torque x RPM divided by 5252.

Torque output at a drive point (wheels or PTO) is going to be a function of the gearing ratio since gearing is just round levers and we can trade RPM for more torque or vice versa using different gear ratios. Since the PTO should be running at 540 RPM, and we have the rated PTO HP, we can calculate the output torque at the PTO.

Mahindra rates the PTO HP on the 5035 gear models at 43HP, so our equation would be:

43HP=540 RPM X ??? lb-ft / 5252

5253 X 43 / 540

225836 / 540

418.12 lb-ft of torque at the PTO on those Mahindra 5035's.

Engine torque is really irrelevant since it's all going to run through various gearing which will make the trade offs in RPM and torque to get the desired speed at the drive point. That's why we rate engines in HP. It is a rating that indicates an engines ability to do work.

Diesels are high torque engines and they have to be in order to make equivalent HP to gas engines because they are RPM limited. Diesels just don't turn the higher RPM a gas engine does, but HP is still HP. So, you make a lot more torque, but you have to trade it off for RPM at the drive wheels (or PTO).

The 5.9L Cummins in my Dodge Ram makes 600 lb-ft of torque, way more than a 360cu-in gas engine, but it makes that torque at only 1600 RPM, so the transmission has be geared to trade off a lot of that torque for RPM at the rear wheels to reach highway speeds. It's a torque beast, but it's still only rated at 325 HP because of the low RPMs. In other words, due to the gearing, at normal driving speeds, I'm still only putting around the same amount of torque down on at the rear wheels as an equivalent gas engined truck.

The differences in torque with engines can, however make a big difference in driveability. Once in top gear my Ram never downshifts while cruising the highway, even up hills, etc where as a gas truck will downshift, etc to get the torque it needs to the rear wheels to maintain speed.

So, HP is HP and regardless of the engine type, torque output of the engine, etc equal HP engines will do the same work, it will just be a matter of how it is geared and what you have to do with the gears to maintain the output you need.

Contrary to popular belief, diesel engines are used in heavy equipment, not because they are higher torque engines, but because of economics. They last longer (lower RPM running, less longer term wear), more energy in equivalent amount of diesel fuel vs gas, better milage and less gear shifting while in use.

It would b e possible to put a 325 shaft HP turbine engine in my truck and do all the same pulling and highway driving with the same capabilities as with the diesel, but a turbine engine makes little torque, but has a huge RPM range (jet engines turn upwards of 150,000 RPM depending on size), but OMG, it would be a gearing nightmare to try to convert all that RPM to usable torque across a broad range of road speed. Turbines also don't spool up or down quickly, so while the "power" at the rear wheels could be made exactly the same, driving that thing would difficult at best, not to mention very costly since turbines are not particularly efficient on the fuel.
 
   / 5035 Questions #12  
Since HP is a calculated figure derived from the torque and RPM relationship you can calculate it out for any given HP rating, or figure any of the values as long as you have the other two.

HP=torque x RPM divided by 5252.

Torque output at a drive point (wheels or PTO) is going to be a function of the gearing ratio since gearing is just round levers and we can trade RPM for more torque or vice versa using different gear ratios. Since the PTO should be running at 540 RPM, and we have the rated PTO HP, we can calculate the output torque at the PTO.

Mahindra rates the PTO HP on the 5035 gear models at 43HP, so our equation would be:

43HP=540 RPM X ??? lb-ft / 5252

5253 X 43 / 540

225836 / 540

418.12 lb-ft of torque at the PTO on those Mahindra 5035's.

Engine torque is really irrelevant since it's all going to run through various gearing which will make the trade offs in RPM and torque to get the desired speed at the drive point. That's why we rate engines in HP. It is a rating that indicates an engines ability to do work.

Diesels are high torque engines and they have to be in order to make equivalent HP to gas engines because they are RPM limited. Diesels just don't turn the higher RPM a gas engine does, but HP is still HP. So, you make a lot more torque, but you have to trade it off for RPM at the drive wheels (or PTO).

The 5.9L Cummins in my Dodge Ram makes 600 lb-ft of torque, way more than a 360cu-in gas engine, but it makes that torque at only 1600 RPM, so the transmission has be geared to trade off a lot of that torque for RPM at the rear wheels to reach highway speeds. It's a torque beast, but it's still only rated at 325 HP because of the low RPMs. In other words, due to the gearing, at normal driving speeds, I'm still only putting around the same amount of torque down on at the rear wheels as an equivalent gas engined truck.

The differences in torque with engines can, however make a big difference in driveability. Once in top gear my Ram never downshifts while cruising the highway, even up hills, etc where as a gas truck will downshift, etc to get the torque it needs to the rear wheels to maintain speed.

So, HP is HP and regardless of the engine type, torque output of the engine, etc equal HP engines will do the same work, it will just be a matter of how it is geared and what you have to do with the gears to maintain the output you need.

Contrary to popular belief, diesel engines are used in heavy equipment, not because they are higher torque engines, but because of economics. They last longer (lower RPM running, less longer term wear), more energy in equivalent amount of diesel fuel vs gas, better milage and less gear shifting while in use.

It would b e possible to put a 325 shaft HP turbine engine in my truck and do all the same pulling and highway driving with the same capabilities as with the diesel, but a turbine engine makes little torque, but has a huge RPM range (jet engines turn upwards of 150,000 RPM depending on size), but OMG, it would be a gearing nightmare to try to convert all that RPM to usable torque across a broad range of road speed. Turbines also don't spool up or down quickly, so while the "power" at the rear wheels could be made exactly the same, driving that thing would difficult at best, not to mention very costly since turbines are not particularly efficient on the fuel.

WOW that was a very insightfull post and I for one found it very interesting and easily read.
Thanks for the good explanation:thumbsup:
 
   / 5035 Questions #13  
5035 was dropped off today for me to demo with a bent loader arm (left one) (?) Entire loader assembly is "cockeyed" and appears as if it is mounted about 6 inches off center. Same one I drove on the dealer lot last weekend (with no bent loader arm!). Puts a dent in my "tractor olympics" plan for the weekend. Looks like pulling events only.

Gee, I've got one on the lot without a bent loader arm.
 
   / 5035 Questions
  • Thread Starter
#14  
Had a lot of fun this past Saturday putting two fine machines through their paces. Here are the results of a comparison that will probably give the folks at the Nebraska Tractor Test Lab a few laughs.

First order of business was to weigh both machines. Luckily, I had access to a nearby truck scale.

New Holland TC55DA w/ loader: 7260 lbs (loaded tires and rear wheel weights)
Mahindra 5035 PST w/ loader : 7600 lbs (loaded tires, no wheel weights)

Pulling Test: 4 bottom plow hitch pins too big to fit the Mahindra's lift arms, so I had to improvise on this one. Had a few "mafia block" on the property, so I hitched on to one of them with a clevice pinned to each tractor's factory drawbar. Mafia block weighed 4000 lbs. Both tractors would drag the block around in 4wd, even with the 1500 - 2000 lbs of dirt that accumulated in front of the block. No detectable difference between the tractors in this mode. Shifted each tractor to 2wd to see if I could find a winner. Here's where the Mahindra's slight weight advantage and wider rear tires made the difference. Pulled the block with the NH as far as I could in 2wd until forward movement stopped. Then hooked up with Mahindra in 2wd and pulled the block another 12 feet or so before the Mahindra gave up.

Winner: Mahindra

Loader Test:

Had very wet pile of old horse manure I had been wind rowing with the NH for the past couple of weeks. Takes a lot of finesse not to "lawn jart" the NH loader into the pile and overwhelm the loader with too much weight. Not a problem with the Mahindra - I could consistently enter the pile more aggressively with the Mahindra and the loader would rarely get overwhelmed. (Was using similar gear speeds with both tractors - 2nd gear, Medium range)

Winner: Mahindra

Engine Power/Torque Rise

Where the NH fell short in the loader department, it shined in the delivery of engine power and the ability of the engine to really lug "down low" and keep going without stalling. In the same manure pile, the NH would consistently push through a larger pile of manure and "lug" better that the Mahindra (both machines in 2nd gear, Medium range). Had to drop the Mahindra to 1st gear, Medium range (noticeably slower ground speed than the NH) to achieve the same result. Mahindra felt like it needed a gear somewhere between 1st and 2nd in Medium range. Not a dramatic difference between the machines, but noticeable nonetheless. The NH runs out of loader capability before motor, the Mahindra runs out of motor before loader. That said, the Mahindra is no slouch and is a real tank. Had I not had the NH there for comparison, I would have no idea what I was missing. Later, hooked up my 72" rotary cutter to the Mahindra and knocked down some moderate to thick brush and saplings. Could not tell any appreciable difference from the NH.

Winner: New Holland

Ergonomics/"Feel"

Much prefer the spacious platform of the Mahindra to the NH. Truly feels like you are sitting "on" the tractor, and have a great, commanding view of your surroundings - tons of room too.

NH is not uncomfortable by any means, but feels more like you are sitting "in" the tractor and not "on" it.

Mahindra feels like the more substantial unit of the two (see "tank" reference - as a former M1A1 tanker, I know.)

QA plate and attachment arms much more substantial and beefier on Mahindra, but where is the leveling rod for bucket? Do they offer one? "Level" sticker on top of bucket is awkward and inconvenient.

Love the bigger tires on the Mahindra - looks mean and gives it great traction.

Winner: Mahindra

Lots of fun, two very well-made tractors. Though a loyal "blue" owner for years, I would have to give the Mahindra the win here. If only Mahindra could get Shibaura to sell them the motor from the old TC 55 series, wow, that would be one scary tractor.

I have pics from the "event" last weekend, but not sure how to post them here. If anyone can shed any light on how to do that, I'll be happy to post them.
 
Last edited:
   / 5035 Questions #15  
I recieved my 5035 about two months ago. it is now back at the dealer for you guessed it the tool carrier on the ML130 was bent os that the left lock would not lock down. must have had a bad batch? I also had a hydraulic leak on thright side and the hood latch was bent. and the lock on the FEL wolndn't lock. thats the disc on the handle when yoy push it down it should lock the FEL. just thought you may want to look at these things.:thumbsup:
 
   / 5035 Questions
  • Thread Starter
#16  
Taking delivery of the 5035 PST w/ R1's this coming week with 3rd function loader valve, block heater, and bucket level rod installed. Dealer will also install a new, non-bent loader. My only lingering concern is the 3 pt hitch - doesn't raise any of my implements very high (even after top-link AND lift arm adjustment) and seems a little tempermental. Will have dealer take a look before delivery I guess. Anyone else have that experience?
 
   / 5035 Questions #17  
I have a 5035 (gear) with R1's and pull a 3/16 plow with no trouble in FWD assist 2nd gear, medium range. Biggest issue is getting the plow to line up due to the width of the rears.
 
   / 5035 Questions #18  
Dang I wish I could pull a three bottom with my 5010. I have been breaking new ground this year 2-14" in med one and low three in spots. That 5035 is a great tractor, and what I went to buy. We really wanted a cab, but I still want a 5035 hst for planting! Hey congrats on the tractor, have fun!
 
   / 5035 Questions #19  
Taking delivery of the 5035 PST w/ R1's this coming week with 3rd function loader valve, block heater, and bucket level rod installed. Dealer will also install a new, non-bent loader. My only lingering concern is the 3 pt hitch - doesn't raise any of my implements very high (even after top-link AND lift arm adjustment) and seems a little tempermental. Will have dealer take a look before delivery I guess. Anyone else have that experience?

On your lift height problem, your 5035 has three different spots to attach the top link. Try moving your top link down to the bottom spot in the casting. This will give you the max lift height. Also, Mahindra sells the Cat 2 lower arm adjusters for your lower links. I don't know why they don't just put the Cat 2 ones on a tractor this massive at the factory. Your dealer can get them or you can order them online if you want Cat 2 for your 4-bottom plow...
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2012 Honda Civic Coupe (A50324)
2012 Honda Civic...
377671 (A51573)
377671 (A51573)
2014 Ford F-150 Pickup Truck (A50323)
2014 Ford F-150...
2006 John Deere 120C Hydraulic Excavator (A50322)
2006 John Deere...
2006 Ford F150 (A50120)
2006 Ford F150...
1998 Spartan Mountain Master 40FT Class A Motorhome (A50324)
1998 Spartan...
 
Top