Soundguy
Old Timer
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2002
- Messages
- 51,575
- Location
- Central florida
- Tractor
- RK 55HC,ym1700, NH7610S, Ford 8N, 2N, NAA, 660, 850 x2, 541, 950, 941D, 951, 2000, 3000, 4000, 4600, 5000, 740, IH 'C' 'H', CUB, John Deere 'B', allis 'G', case VAC
Re: 6\' KK rotary cutter problem!!
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( For now I will go with a grade 5 bolt and in the near future I will buy KK slip clutch option for my mower )</font>
The harder bolt just needs more of a shock load to clip it.. I don't like that... less protection factor for the diveline.
I don't think the slip clutch is a 'fix' either... the load to make the clutch slip is fairly decent... Quick shock loads pop bolts.. but may not get 'much' slip from a clutch.. like say.. hanginf a blade on a stump and having a 90-100% slip goin on.. saving your trans from a stall situation.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( thought the folks at KK would have tried to make it right instead of blaming the PTO of the tractor. )</font>
Why should the mower manufacturer have to 'fix' a tractor design that makes a shock load situation on the tractors pto.
Thos 'cheap' mowers are in use everywhere.. I have a 5' kk mower that has been used and abused.. on my 8n, NAA, and ex Nh1920 diesel that can run a 6' mower easilly. I've mowed in 7' tall weeds.. no problems.. course I have the clutch and can feather the engagement of the pto.. not slam-bang and go..
I don't see this as a mower fault.. but a tractor/pto issue.. that seems to be correctable by using a lower rpm at startup, and a different pto mode.. as evidenced by other posts here...
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( A simple fix would be to have one blade offset to miss the second blade at startup )</font>
Different height.. or different length.. I'm sure that would make for some interesting design calcs.... Seems like lower leading blade would be doing most of the cutting...
Soundguy
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( For now I will go with a grade 5 bolt and in the near future I will buy KK slip clutch option for my mower )</font>
The harder bolt just needs more of a shock load to clip it.. I don't like that... less protection factor for the diveline.
I don't think the slip clutch is a 'fix' either... the load to make the clutch slip is fairly decent... Quick shock loads pop bolts.. but may not get 'much' slip from a clutch.. like say.. hanginf a blade on a stump and having a 90-100% slip goin on.. saving your trans from a stall situation.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( thought the folks at KK would have tried to make it right instead of blaming the PTO of the tractor. )</font>
Why should the mower manufacturer have to 'fix' a tractor design that makes a shock load situation on the tractors pto.
Thos 'cheap' mowers are in use everywhere.. I have a 5' kk mower that has been used and abused.. on my 8n, NAA, and ex Nh1920 diesel that can run a 6' mower easilly. I've mowed in 7' tall weeds.. no problems.. course I have the clutch and can feather the engagement of the pto.. not slam-bang and go..
I don't see this as a mower fault.. but a tractor/pto issue.. that seems to be correctable by using a lower rpm at startup, and a different pto mode.. as evidenced by other posts here...
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( A simple fix would be to have one blade offset to miss the second blade at startup )</font>
Different height.. or different length.. I'm sure that would make for some interesting design calcs.... Seems like lower leading blade would be doing most of the cutting...
Soundguy