Freep
Silver Member
I have played around with the tools I have as you suggest, though I have not gotten quite so far with it (your comments are helpful here). You've confirmed my suspicions that the TR3 does not do anything new, just combines multiple functions into a single implement. I am viewing the TR3 more as an efficiency than a required implement. I think it save me time and hours on the tractor by requiring fewer passes, and also precludes the shallow (long) learning curve for implements such as box blade.
Don't get me wrong: I want to learn to use all these devices, but I don't want to wait until I learn to use them properly for my ground to be level. My kids need level ground to run around on now, not three years hence. And while I love using the tractor, I also want time to run around with those kids (while they still want to play with their dad).
From a purely economic perspective, using the individual instruments will likely place significant additional hours on my tractor. Assuming my time is worth something, and considering my relative lack of box blade skills and the very challenging and uneven ground, the TR3 seems like a good investment even at the high cost. (I am not considering the more expensive 'Command' version, but the 650lb 'Property' version.)
I assumed as much re: the box blade. Lacking sides, the TR3 seems like it would carry much less soil. Does the TR3 completely replace the LPGS, though?
I thought you had assembled a chain harrow with a boom pole contrived lift mechanism? Am I confusing something?
Don't get me wrong: I want to learn to use all these devices, but I don't want to wait until I learn to use them properly for my ground to be level. My kids need level ground to run around on now, not three years hence. And while I love using the tractor, I also want time to run around with those kids (while they still want to play with their dad).
From a purely economic perspective, using the individual instruments will likely place significant additional hours on my tractor. Assuming my time is worth something, and considering my relative lack of box blade skills and the very challenging and uneven ground, the TR3 seems like a good investment even at the high cost. (I am not considering the more expensive 'Command' version, but the 650lb 'Property' version.)
I assumed as much re: the box blade. Lacking sides, the TR3 seems like it would carry much less soil. Does the TR3 completely replace the LPGS, though?
I thought you had assembled a chain harrow with a boom pole contrived lift mechanism? Am I confusing something?