Aerator Tine

[Villengineer]

Umm, first, I never mentioned any particular method to manufacture the tine. Second, you obviously are lacking in manufacturing experience if you think that changing forming dies is a no expense proposition. Third, they may not see a need to optimize the design and therefore view further study as an unneccessary expense. Other posts in this thread would seem to support that additional research is unwarranted as any special curvature of spline alone will not produce an ideal result. Besides, I can't hardly believe that 3-5% of the oil consumed while pulling aerators amounts to enough to warrant further study. There are far better subjects to study if a reduction of oil consumption is your goal.

 

[nomad]

Junkman, I understand what path the tine follows. It's like in the attached picture. Yes? Does an aerator open a hole in the soil in such a shape? In this thread, I am also questioning the necessity of the curvature. Why curved tine if it's no helpful on not-tearing the soil? If a curvature is really necessary, then why such a curvature in the current tines? If the curved (core plug) tines are better than the straight (core plug) tines, why better? Whats superiority? Small thing, big questions

 

[nomad]

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( you obviously are lacking in manufacturing experience if you think that changing forming dies is a no expense proposition. )</font>
That you missed my point doesn't show that I lack experience in manufacturing. What I said in my previous post is "there is no cost difference between dies of two tines with two different curvatures". I mean no one is changing the die here, here is we are making the both from zero.

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Other posts in this thread would seem to support that additional research is unwarranted as any special curvature of spline alone will not produce an ideal result. )</font>
My question is that current tine was really a product of a research or not. This isn't known yet in this thread.

 

[Wannafish]

Villi - let's put a knuckle in the center. One that will allow it to rotate around the knuckle in only one direction...goes in straight then rotates until it is pulled from the ground by the forward motion of the machine and the rotational motion of the aerator.

 

[Villengineer]

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( "there is no cost difference between dies of two tines with two different curvatures". I mean no one is changing the die here, here is we are making the both from zero. )</font> You assume 1) That all dies cost the same and they don't. The more complex the die the more $. and 2) that they even had a die made. Judging by the simple shape and knowing how the company I work for goes about forming metal, I would guess that they used an existing die.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( My question is that current tine was really a product of a research or not. This isn't known yet in this thread )</font> Who cares? What bearing does it have on anything? If you are going to make a new one and whant to do real research, not just looking at other people's tines, as to what shape would work best, then do it. Why do you feel the need to keep questioning the amount of design work that went into existing products? Also, how does it pertain to supposed reason for all this: the consumption of oil?

 

[Villengineer]

Upon quick review, while this is a valid idea that could be pursued and may accomplish a better motion for the tine, I believe that this would make the tines too expensive both on the front end (cost to manufacture/sell) and in the long term (cost to maintain/service).

 

[nomad]

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( You assume 1) That all dies cost the same and they don't. The more complex the die the more $. )</font>
Who is saying that all dies cost the same. Complexity difference between, say, a parabolic curved tine and spline curved tine is almost zero, hence cost difference is almost zero.

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( 2) that they even had a die made. Judging by the simple shape and knowing how the company I work for goes about forming metal, I would guess that they used an existing die. )</font>
Who is using an existing die? Okay, I just made one, but without spending a $100 or two, I can change the forming/bending die easily (just a little more machining.)

Villengineer, you frequently say I lack engineering, etc.
You are an engineer working for a company. What does your company do? Specialized only in one field or two, aren't they? I am working WITH many manufacturers from metal forming to plastic forming to special casting to tool making for any materials (plastic, steel, aluminum, etc), etc etc. So, I know what I am talking about and know you aren't understanding what I am talking.

" My question is that current tine was really a product of a research or not. This isn't known yet in this thread "
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Who cares? )</font>
I guess people on the forum care and would like to know the truths behind the screens.

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( If you are going to make a new one and want to do real research, not just looking at other people's tines, as to what shape would work best, then do it. Why do you feel the need to keep questioning the amount of design work that went into existing products? )</font>
Why shall not we question? I'm a farmer here like anyone. If another farmer had asked such questions questioning "hard design works" spend in existing products, you would probably be appreciating now. Why double-standart behaving when Nomad is questioning? Let me quess. It is easier to feel the community on your side against a foreigner like a nomad, isn't it? I understand. No problem. By the way, I am saying "there is no design work in existing tine" and you are saying "there is." Can we learn proof of the design work in it from you? Why is that tine curved?

 

[Wannafish]

Too costly? Exactly the reason you and I should design, manufacture, and market them! /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif Lets be the sole supplier of aerator replacement parts as well as supplier to OEM's. They break more often but if mass produced we can cut the costs...and make them out of nylon (no, not pantyhose /forums/images/graemlins/crazy.gif).

I better stop thinking while I am still able. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif

 

[Villengineer]

Too costly, as in I don't want to sell them at a loss or have them setting in my yard b/c no will buy them at a profitable selling price. I simply haven't seen enough aerators running around to justify the expense.

 

[Villengineer]

</font><font color="blueclass=small">( You are an engineer working for a company. What does your company do? Specialized only in one field or two, aren't they? )</font> We are an international company, both in manufacturing locations and sales, that designs and manufactures both standard and custom equipment for many different segments of industry and commercial use. We do make some equipment that is used in various areas in and related to farming, but most of it is not. I happen to design and oversee the manufacture of some of the custom products, including several that are farming related.
</font><font color="blueclass=small">( I am working WITH many manufacturers from metal forming to plastic forming to special casting to tool making for any materials (plastic, steel, aluminum, etc), etc etc. So, I know what I am talking about and know you aren't understanding what I am talking )</font>We cut, form, machine, and weld several different metals right here at our location. We also cut and machine several different types of plastics here. I design components out of metals, plastics, and composites. I also design and specify castings, components for power transmission, and hydraulic systems. Since I design custom equipment that is built right beside "catalog" units I often am very involved in the manufacturing process and methods of achieving the design w/out having special tooling made for each unit. I also work many outside suppliers, so I'm pretty sure I've got a pretty good grasp of what I'm talking about.
</font><font color="blueclass=small">( I guess people on the forum care and would like to know the truths behind the screens )</font>First, you are the only one questioning the design. Second, what are these screens you keep talking about?
</font><font color="blueclass=small">( . If another farmer had asked such questions questioning "hard design works" spend in existing products, you would probably be appreciating now. Why double-standart behaving when Nomad is questioning? Let me quess. It is easier to feel the community on your side against a foreigner like a nomad, isn't it? )</font> I have absolutely no problem with someone asking how a product works. I could care less about where you live. You don't ask how things work, you ask us to help you take someone elses work and use it to make yourself money by calling it your own. I take offense to your attacks on manufacturers and designs. Some of your irresponsible suggestions under the guise of an expert makes me leery of anything you post.
</font><font color="blueclass=small">( By the way, I am saying "there is no design work in existing tine" and you are saying "there is." Can we learn proof of the design work in it from you? Why is that tine curved? )</font> It exists, therefore it was the product of someone's imagination. It did not happen to show up on earth in that form by itself. It is curved b/c someone took the time and effort to specify that it should be curved. There I proved that some design work was performed.