orangebluegreen
Gold Member
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( If you "feel" a motorist is a threat to you or another driver for example and they show you the middle finger, you could shoot them with a gun )</font>
I won’t make too many comments on it because I’ve not read the new law, just going by what I’ve heard in the media and what has taken place locally recently. My understanding is you must feel you or another person are in danger of being harmed by another. My understanding is the fighting force with equal force has been weakened considerably. I don’t think offending someone with a middle finger would count as threatening, but if one were to appear to swerve their car at you in a threatening manner I would think that might count. Not sure if it’s going to make people think twice about aggressive behaviors or cause a log jam of wrongful death suits, still too new to tell.
Some of it may have started when a group of local off duty police officers were involved in a road rage incident just as you mentioned. They were driving in an unmarked car and got into a road rage scuffle with another motorist. Somehow this scuffle was taken to the extent where they were both parked on the side of the road (I forget how it all happened, been a few years.) One motorist approached the vehicle containing the off duty officers and hit their window with a night stick or piece of wood (something of that sort) and the officers opened fire from within the car killing the other motorist, The unmarked car the officers were in had dark tinted windows and apparently the motorist didn’t realize they were police officers. Not sure if it really matters if they were officers, but the ensuing wrongful death suit against the dept was dismissed as justifiable. The family of the motorist argued a broken window did not warrant shooting the man because they could have chosen to drive away from the conflict and did not. This may have been part of why the law was written? But in any case.....a few weeks ago not far from my area a neighbor gunned down another who walked onto his property. They claim he had a bat in hand and apparently it was considered justifiable according to the new law. The wife of the man killed said he had no weapon and was there to make amends for some dispute between the two neighbors and she claimed the shooting was pre meditated. Nothing happened. Some of my details may be off a bit going from memory, but they are very close if not exact.
BTW....all the Florida laws are posted online, I just haven’t had time to look it up.
But on to Alligators.....
I won’t make too many comments on it because I’ve not read the new law, just going by what I’ve heard in the media and what has taken place locally recently. My understanding is you must feel you or another person are in danger of being harmed by another. My understanding is the fighting force with equal force has been weakened considerably. I don’t think offending someone with a middle finger would count as threatening, but if one were to appear to swerve their car at you in a threatening manner I would think that might count. Not sure if it’s going to make people think twice about aggressive behaviors or cause a log jam of wrongful death suits, still too new to tell.
Some of it may have started when a group of local off duty police officers were involved in a road rage incident just as you mentioned. They were driving in an unmarked car and got into a road rage scuffle with another motorist. Somehow this scuffle was taken to the extent where they were both parked on the side of the road (I forget how it all happened, been a few years.) One motorist approached the vehicle containing the off duty officers and hit their window with a night stick or piece of wood (something of that sort) and the officers opened fire from within the car killing the other motorist, The unmarked car the officers were in had dark tinted windows and apparently the motorist didn’t realize they were police officers. Not sure if it really matters if they were officers, but the ensuing wrongful death suit against the dept was dismissed as justifiable. The family of the motorist argued a broken window did not warrant shooting the man because they could have chosen to drive away from the conflict and did not. This may have been part of why the law was written? But in any case.....a few weeks ago not far from my area a neighbor gunned down another who walked onto his property. They claim he had a bat in hand and apparently it was considered justifiable according to the new law. The wife of the man killed said he had no weapon and was there to make amends for some dispute between the two neighbors and she claimed the shooting was pre meditated. Nothing happened. Some of my details may be off a bit going from memory, but they are very close if not exact.
BTW....all the Florida laws are posted online, I just haven’t had time to look it up.
But on to Alligators.....