jjp8182
Platinum Member
I think it's both yes and no ....in that some of the toughest are becoming tougher, while others are getting softer (both physically and mentally).
On the tougher side, the availability of high nutrition foods and focused weight training has permitted those who chose to do so to achieve feats that were nearly unimaginable 50 years ago. .... and that's come with increasing number of life-long injuries as well. When I graduated high school at the turn of the current century there were more than a few of my classmates that had pushed their sports particpation and training to the point they would never again be able to play the sports they had - and a few had already had joint replacement surgeries.
One of the coaches we had pointed out one time that the high school weight room was far better furnished than the college university where he played in the 70's(?) (and it wasn't a small university program).
Personally I chose to (mostly) stop competing & training in college, because if it came to a choice between play a game and being able to walk unassisted for the rest of my life I'm going to chose walking (though not all do given the lure of $$$$$ in sports).
So those who chose to can become far stronger, faster, & tougher physically than prior generations. ....however, in most cases it's going to be a deliberate choice.
Now when it comes to mental toughness, I'd say it's the same situation ... the toughest are tougher and the softies are much softer. Given how horribly broken some parts of the nation are, when someone makes it out of a troubled area and becomes successful it's likely because they persevered & overcame a lot of temptation -- or even threats on their life (in the case of gangs).
Then of course there are those who choose to serve in armed services, while decreasing as a percentage of the population anyone who joined in 2001 could (if they stayed) now be retiring with ~20 years of service that may have been largely served in combat. 4 years (most/all of WW2) vs. a potential 20? Wars fought with mappable battle fronts vs. an insurgency? I know which I'd consider tougher.
No, I think that the divide between the extremes in society is becoming more extreme rather than a singular trend toward softness. In large part it's likely driven by technology that permits fewer to do more (and more easily), and permits the rest to live a life without ever really learning or understanding what it takes to support their life. ..... and sooner or later I think that divide is going to completly rip this country apart as the different groups become incapable of civilly communicating with each other given the drastic difference in each groups understanding of "reality".
From what I've seen if a person is too insulated from what it takes to survive away from the luxuries of society there's a good chance society as a construct will start to be taken for granted, and not valued for all that it provides.
...but that's just my opinion which may not be worth much; because in the end whatever the reality is, it doesn't really care about human opinions since it is what it is and it's not controlled by humans.
On the tougher side, the availability of high nutrition foods and focused weight training has permitted those who chose to do so to achieve feats that were nearly unimaginable 50 years ago. .... and that's come with increasing number of life-long injuries as well. When I graduated high school at the turn of the current century there were more than a few of my classmates that had pushed their sports particpation and training to the point they would never again be able to play the sports they had - and a few had already had joint replacement surgeries.
One of the coaches we had pointed out one time that the high school weight room was far better furnished than the college university where he played in the 70's(?) (and it wasn't a small university program).
Personally I chose to (mostly) stop competing & training in college, because if it came to a choice between play a game and being able to walk unassisted for the rest of my life I'm going to chose walking (though not all do given the lure of $$$$$ in sports).
So those who chose to can become far stronger, faster, & tougher physically than prior generations. ....however, in most cases it's going to be a deliberate choice.
Now when it comes to mental toughness, I'd say it's the same situation ... the toughest are tougher and the softies are much softer. Given how horribly broken some parts of the nation are, when someone makes it out of a troubled area and becomes successful it's likely because they persevered & overcame a lot of temptation -- or even threats on their life (in the case of gangs).
Then of course there are those who choose to serve in armed services, while decreasing as a percentage of the population anyone who joined in 2001 could (if they stayed) now be retiring with ~20 years of service that may have been largely served in combat. 4 years (most/all of WW2) vs. a potential 20? Wars fought with mappable battle fronts vs. an insurgency? I know which I'd consider tougher.
No, I think that the divide between the extremes in society is becoming more extreme rather than a singular trend toward softness. In large part it's likely driven by technology that permits fewer to do more (and more easily), and permits the rest to live a life without ever really learning or understanding what it takes to support their life. ..... and sooner or later I think that divide is going to completly rip this country apart as the different groups become incapable of civilly communicating with each other given the drastic difference in each groups understanding of "reality".
From what I've seen if a person is too insulated from what it takes to survive away from the luxuries of society there's a good chance society as a construct will start to be taken for granted, and not valued for all that it provides.
...but that's just my opinion which may not be worth much; because in the end whatever the reality is, it doesn't really care about human opinions since it is what it is and it's not controlled by humans.