Never said I was using SI units. The equation is a generality.
Does not matter what units you use....it will come out the same way.....
You stated that "Flow=Pressure/Friction"
Flow=volume per time unit
Volume is distance x distance x distance=distance^3, common std unit is inch, so it will be inch^3
Time is measured in seconds, s.
Pressure is force per area unit
Common std unit for force is pounds, lbs.
Area is distance x distance=distance^2, common std unit is inch, so it will be inch^2
Friction is a force that is opposing the a the force that tries to move an object.
Your statement "Flow=Pressure/Friction" can be expressed like this...
volume/time=(force/area)/force
or
inch^3/s=(lbs/inch^2)/lbs
and it will come out as
inch^5=s.......:thumbdown:
Flow is proportional to pressure.
proof it or take it back!!
The unit of resistance would have to be in terms that made sense. Actually, the units of resistance would be N-s/m^5 for this situation.
Don't go public with that one....LOL....:thumbdown:
Everything cancels out, 1=1.
Did not! :thumbdown:
A simple example of the above equation, although in the electric domain, would be:
Current = voltage / resistance; or V=IR
The units of resistance is volts/amps.
I love hydraulic-electric analogies!:thumbsup:
But they have to be used carefully, a std electric system is almost always constant pressure (voltage) and closed loop. I just dont see how electric analogy will save your day here.....the amps is flow and the voltage is the pressure, the resistance is the load........it is the voltage that drives the amps through the circuit. Voltage is the "force".....force makes it, the amps, go.
And Redneck, if pressure increases, flow will have to increase.
I am OK with that!
Think of the electric analogy. If you increase the voltage, the current will increase. That's known as Ohm's Law
.
I am OK with that too!
For hydraulics, the pressure is usually proportional to the flow squared and is not a linear relationship. P=C x Q^2
Does that "back up" my formula statement? :confused2:
I am confused too....:confused2:
All I am saying is that two different hydraulic situations can be modeled, one in which pressures are an input and one where flows are the input. The resulting motions, pressures and flows are dependent upon the reactions to the inputs. And yes, Newton was also correct.
If we use a combustion engine, the source for the prime mover force is in the combustion room, converted from chemical energy stored in fuel and oxygen. The rest of the drive chain can be considered part of the load, piston, crankshaft, pump shaft, gears, fluid, piston, piston rod,linkage and finally "the bucket", that lift the load.
Flow is just something that happens (action or reaction) in the drive chain.....flow is just moving fluid....like the moving piston rod.....but just because the fixation that hydraulics is "complicated", we think that flow is magic.....no one ever calls that the "flow" of piston rod "makes it go"...inch^3 per second of solid steel.....which is an equivalent call to that "flow makes it go".....
Myth dead now?
ps. Glad you accepted that Newton was correct!!:thumbsup: