canoetrpr said:
I recall Soundguy I think pointing out that CaCl2 is a LOT cheaper at swimming pool supply places rather than tire places. You might want to follow up on that.
That was me! A tire dealer quoted me near $50 per 50lb bag. A pool supply vendor quoted me 20-something. I found it at a Southern States Co-op for $16.95 per 50lb bag a few weeks back.
I filled two 13.6X28 R1's with Cacl at a 3-1/2lb per gallon mix. (approx $120 as I recall) The tractor I replaced tires on has had Cacl in the rears for 36 years. One rim had SOME surface rust on the inside as a result of a leak some years ago. 2nd rim, which had never seen a flat, had NO rust. It looked like it did when new in 1971. I use tubes. Always have, always will. (Reason for re-newing mix? Old mix was diluted and "freeze protection" was potentially (likely) compromised after several flats during recent years. Old mix was used to treat a gravel drive to reduce dust. That, and MY OCD said NEW fluid after 36 years

NO Bill, I DIDN'T wax the inside of the rims before re-mounting tires)
Corrosion issue is grossly overstated in most instances. Cacl won't cause your rims to implode in a few days. Allow a leaking tire/tube to remain in place for months, you might have a problem in 25 years. If it were as bad as some people would have you believe, don't you suppose farmers, who are by nature a practical bunch, would have looked elsewhere for ballast material a LONG time ago? It isn't the biological nightmare some would have you to believe either. It's relatively easy to control a fluid leak in a tractor tire. Get the leak at 12 o-clock, jack the wheel up, and release air pressure. Leak stopped. ANY fluid fill has it's cost. Regardless of Cacl, beet juice, WWF, or auto anti-freeze, I want to contain and save ANY fluid in the event of a leak.
There are other options, but Cacl is a GOOD option. It's been used since the inception of pneumatic tires on farm tractors without serious challenge. Don't let old wives tales and sales propaganda scare you away. Make your decision based on cost, practicality, and functionality.