JOR_EL
Silver Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2001
- Messages
- 242
- Tractor
- JD4700 HST w/mods. SUPERBABY
Just saw the evening news. Will try to ask this relatively calmly:
Is anyone else outraged by the latest "atrocity" our tax dollars were spent on?
So the one CIA operative says, "He(the suspect pilot) doesn't fit the profile(of a drug-smuggler)".
Then: "I think we're making a mistake! "
And the other one says " I agree with you!"
But NO ONE takes adequate action to STOP what's going on!
So the "team" shoots down an unarmed civilian plane, that MIGHT be a "bandito"!
Do you think if he had said "I think we're about to murder innocent people!", they would have been a little more motivated to change the plan?
I guess using innocuous words makes murder just "a mistake", ...so it's no big deal.
And if you do your murdering with military equipment(instead of civilian), under "government" auspices, it's not murder, its an "action", ...after all, you were on a "mission".
But gee, didn't the CIA guys try to get the Peruvian pilot to stop shooting? "NO mas! NO mas!"
Sure, but whoops!... too late. People already dead and wounded. Oh well. it was a "communication problem".
No, ... it was an IDIOT problem! The idiot who sets up a US-CIA/Peruvian "hunter-killer" team with life or death decisions to be made, without certain CLEAR and EFFECTIVE coordination.
I guess the CIA has no agents with the required language skills.
But hey, I'm probably too harsh,...they MIGHT have been druggies, huh? Huh?
What are we supposed to do, ...let people go because they MIGHT NOT be?
Idiots!
The older I get, the less tolerance I have for gung-ho trigger-happys supposedly in MY employ, pulling these kind of stunts on My behalf, and paying the millions of $ they deserve to be sued-for with MY tax dollars.
I'll feel just a tad better if at least someone out there feels the same way! Any birds of a similar feather?
Larry
Is anyone else outraged by the latest "atrocity" our tax dollars were spent on?
So the one CIA operative says, "He(the suspect pilot) doesn't fit the profile(of a drug-smuggler)".
Then: "I think we're making a mistake! "
And the other one says " I agree with you!"
But NO ONE takes adequate action to STOP what's going on!
So the "team" shoots down an unarmed civilian plane, that MIGHT be a "bandito"!
Do you think if he had said "I think we're about to murder innocent people!", they would have been a little more motivated to change the plan?
I guess using innocuous words makes murder just "a mistake", ...so it's no big deal.
And if you do your murdering with military equipment(instead of civilian), under "government" auspices, it's not murder, its an "action", ...after all, you were on a "mission".
But gee, didn't the CIA guys try to get the Peruvian pilot to stop shooting? "NO mas! NO mas!"
Sure, but whoops!... too late. People already dead and wounded. Oh well. it was a "communication problem".
No, ... it was an IDIOT problem! The idiot who sets up a US-CIA/Peruvian "hunter-killer" team with life or death decisions to be made, without certain CLEAR and EFFECTIVE coordination.
I guess the CIA has no agents with the required language skills.
But hey, I'm probably too harsh,...they MIGHT have been druggies, huh? Huh?
What are we supposed to do, ...let people go because they MIGHT NOT be?
Idiots!
The older I get, the less tolerance I have for gung-ho trigger-happys supposedly in MY employ, pulling these kind of stunts on My behalf, and paying the millions of $ they deserve to be sued-for with MY tax dollars.
I'll feel just a tad better if at least someone out there feels the same way! Any birds of a similar feather?
Larry