The way this goal is designed, the pole is anchored at the back of the base and comes forward at a good angle, supported by legs at the front of the base. Then the dimensions of the linkages in the top correct for the error induced by the tilted pole.
I think this makes it a good candidate for a design change which addresses the problem you identified. With a heavy enough
ballast, that pole could be anchored at the front of the base instead of the back, taking the pole obstacle out of the picture for all except those absolutely determined to hit it by running an additional 4 or 5 steps beyond the backboard.
Toddler drawing for reference:
View attachment 779645