buckeyefarmer
Epic Contributor
Funny one.
Executive orders are nuts, they just get reversed upon party change.EV sales targets to be announced today along with new fuel economy rules for 2030
Executive order stating a minimum of 50% EV's by 2030 (this will include fuel cell and hybrid plugins).
Emission standards for 2023-2026 vehicles will also be stated.
Executive orders are nuts, they just get reversed upon party change.
Oops. Polyticks. Back to the topic of the thread.
No, they have a leadership problemAnd CA doesn't have a grid problem?
![]()
Amid worsening drought, Lake Oroville's record-low water level forces shutdown of hydroelectric power plant
California water officials have shut down of a major hydroelectric powerplant at Lake Oroville in Northern California, citing the lowest-ever recorded water level.www.latimes.com
You have a meeting announcing ya want the members attending to build 40-50% of their new vehicles 8 years from now as zero emission vehicles.Also noticed Tesla wasn't even invited.
Not that they need any help selling EV's -since the entire 3rd quarter quota is already sold out.
Tesla is not angling for a corporate bailout. Pay attention to the wording of the OEMs. They understand just as Tesla and Nissan lost billions the first ten years of making EVs so will the OEMs. Who does GM expect to repay the 35 billions they are borrowing to play catch up to Tesla?Also noticed Tesla wasn't even invited.
Not that they need any help selling EV's -since the entire 3rd quarter quota is already sold out.
I have more confidence in GM building quality cars than Tesla. If Tesla can do it then GM or any traditional automaker will do it better. I do give credit to Musk for the innovation.Tesla is not angling for a corporate bailout. Pay attention to the wording of the OEMs. They understand just as Tesla and Nissan lost billions the first ten years of making EVs so will the OEMs. Who does GM expect to repay the 35 billions they are borrowing to play catch up to Tesla?