Saying nothing about the political/economic situation, I am wondering about which type of rifle to look for to use as a "home/property defense weapon"?
I live in NW Georgia at the perimeter of a national forest. My property is situated on a hilltop with forest pretty much all around it. We raise registered Boer goats on 10 acres of pasture that is 2 acres of open grass and the rest mixed forest with grass spots. We are fairly isolated with farms and 5 to 10 acre homes in the surrounding miles.
Predators, both human and 4 legged are both to be guarded against. With "hard times" seemingly in the cards I wonder what would be the best home defense weapon to have available?
Currently, we have a Remington 12 ga pump, a scoped semi 22, and a SW snub nose 38. The 22 is great for getting the tree rats but has little stopping power. The shotgun won't reach out as they head out through the woods or down/up the drive.
It would seem that a larger caliber rifle is needed. My military service made me very familiar with the M14 and 16. I favor the idea of having a lot of rounds at a rapid rate on hand. I find the cost of the M14 prohibitive. A bolt action may be to slow..............
Ideas?.............thanks..........God bless OUR country..........Dennis
You posted that you like the M14...
I can understand why you like the M14. Well, an AR10 would suit you well for the perimeter of your property. Reliable, a lot less cumbersome than your old M14, collapsible stock, shortened barrel length, either iron sighted or you can add an optic for CQB which will suffice for both short and longer ranges. Lots of knockdown as you know and the ammo is relatively cheap if you buy military surplus. Even new production 7.62x51mm, Federal/ATK white box, 149grain, FMJ ball is cheap. However, my AR10 isn't my choice for "in-the-home" protection. Cons to an AR10...they aren't cheap.
You posted you have a .38 pistol and 12ga. pump...
Great "in-the-home" protection, either of them. Since you were military, I am confident you know how to use either.
You posted that you are fairly isolated...
Seems you're pretty rural. Don't have to worry about hitting a neighbor when the round goes through your house. That's a plus. A lot of people live in the city, or other areas where neighbors are close by. Using an AR10 or 15 inside the home could be lethal to John and Jane Doe next door. Frangible ammunition works great for this type of problem.
As for the possibility of being pre-judged by a lawyer or media for owning such weaponry (AR's, etc.) after you've whacked an intruder, that's a fact of life in liberal Amerika these days (considering your location). If it's legal to own in your state, you have a legal entitlement to purchase it and it's nobody's business what you have behind your bedroom door.
EddieWalker said:
If it gets to the point of pulling out a firearm, your life is going to change forever, and probably for the worse.
I realize you have a mr. niceguy reputation to stay aligned with and that's cool, but why the ethical policeman? Don't you think we are all adults here and can intelligently surmise a potentially hostile situation? How would me pulling out a firearm and possibly using it, change my life for the worse? Is it because I had to stop someone from killing someone in my family. This is 2008 Eddie, I've got to assume that someone who's invaded my home is going to do bodily harm to my child, my wife, or me, or all of us! If you're assuming less, you're gambling with your life, or as you say "worse"...possibly the life of a loved one. I doubt the guy was breaking in to sell me girl scout cookies, or build a fire and make smores!
EddieWalker said:
The more it appears that you are looking for a war, the more dificult it will be to say you were just defending yourself.
So by owning weapons which, by the laws of your state are legal, you purchased legally, and can possess legally, to protect your family or just plink, automatically predisposes you to guilt by association? Because I own those weapons, I'm looking for a war? I think you've been watching too much of the Clinton News Network and reading too much Time magazine. I guess my neighbor (1/4 mile away through the woods) is a racist, because he flies a Confederate flag beneath Old Glory. Nevermind that he has the right to do so and oh by the way, his great-great grandfather served in an Alabama unit during the civil war. Stereotyping is real and is a fact in the way humans perceive things, but I doubt "stereotypical" will stand up in court. If it did, OJ wouldn't have been looking for his wife's murderer on all those golf courses for the last 10 or so years...he'd have been reading about those golf courses from his 5-star prison dormitory.
EddieWalker said:
Long range assult rifles will put you on the defence regardless of the situation. When shooting at people long range, it's very hard to say that your life was in danger and it was self defense.
I'm not disagreeing with you regarding long range acquisition/shooting and proving the person was meaning you bodily harm from 1,2,3,4 or 500 yards. I agree.
EddieWalker said:
I don't have an assult rifle and don't want one.
You make it sound like there's something wrong with owning an AR! I don't have an assault rifle either. I have several AR's though. Semantics? Nope...just media ignorance. Any black rifle or semi-auto (military looking weapon) is evil and an assault rifle. I wouldn't mind owning one though, but the prices are astonishing. Why would I want one, because it's my right to have one...at least until the next regime, then probably not.
Good day

,
Podunk