Richard
Elite Member
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2000
- Messages
- 4,999
- Location
- Knoxville, TN
- Tractor
- International 1066 Full sized JCB Loader/Backhoe and a John Deere 430 to mow with
I'm not an attorney nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn last night, so with that out of the way.
Single ownership is certainly a great goal. Maybe not always do-able. cutting into parcels might or might not leave someone thinking..."he/she got the better part"
(as point of history, I'm on 250 acres with Father in law. Farm is owned 4/9 by him, 4/9 by his sister and 1/9 by his OTHER sister... the OTHER sister has passed and her 1/9 now belongs to her 4 kids, further complicating things)
I took him to an estate attorney and ONE idea he came up with was creating a family limited partnership. Each family then creates a living trust and the partnership shares go into it.
There would be voting shares (in case FIL decided to sell the entire farm) and NON voting shares.
The attorney was going to make (I'm making this number up) one million NON-voting shares so the FIL and Uncle in law could GIFT away ownership of the land if they wanted. By having sufficient shares, each share would be under the gift limitations.
Since these were nonvoting shares, they ALL could be given away, but if FIL decided to sell the land, he could do so but the proceeds would follow the share owners.
By doing this, the covenants could have some bylaws in them, such as (see other threads) NO 4-wheelers, NO (insert activity). Also, if someone wanted to sell some of their shares, they could be required to offer them to the family members FIRST, before selling them to an 'outsider' (thereby helping to force consolidation)
As a side note, when this generation passes, it will go from 3 owners (4/9, 4/9, 1/9) to TWELVE owners.
This does not include spouses so it could get real interesting (pain in hiney) real fast.
I was urging FIL to pursue this plan of action, even to the point of me PAYING for it. He had nothing to lose really. Oh, it would also have had the benefit of getting any FUTURE growth of value, out of his estate and that growth would be in the trust.
So many good points.
I've got ZERO idea why he continues to stick his head in the sand and think it will go awah. HE is the one that will 'go away' (when his time comes) and the problem will simply get worse.
So, you might be able to keep the property as a single unit, which ought to enhance its resale value later on if so decided???
None of the above was legal advice, medical advice, nor astrology advice
Good luck with what ever road you choose.
Single ownership is certainly a great goal. Maybe not always do-able. cutting into parcels might or might not leave someone thinking..."he/she got the better part"
(as point of history, I'm on 250 acres with Father in law. Farm is owned 4/9 by him, 4/9 by his sister and 1/9 by his OTHER sister... the OTHER sister has passed and her 1/9 now belongs to her 4 kids, further complicating things)
I took him to an estate attorney and ONE idea he came up with was creating a family limited partnership. Each family then creates a living trust and the partnership shares go into it.
There would be voting shares (in case FIL decided to sell the entire farm) and NON voting shares.
The attorney was going to make (I'm making this number up) one million NON-voting shares so the FIL and Uncle in law could GIFT away ownership of the land if they wanted. By having sufficient shares, each share would be under the gift limitations.
Since these were nonvoting shares, they ALL could be given away, but if FIL decided to sell the land, he could do so but the proceeds would follow the share owners.
By doing this, the covenants could have some bylaws in them, such as (see other threads) NO 4-wheelers, NO (insert activity). Also, if someone wanted to sell some of their shares, they could be required to offer them to the family members FIRST, before selling them to an 'outsider' (thereby helping to force consolidation)
As a side note, when this generation passes, it will go from 3 owners (4/9, 4/9, 1/9) to TWELVE owners.
This does not include spouses so it could get real interesting (pain in hiney) real fast.
I was urging FIL to pursue this plan of action, even to the point of me PAYING for it. He had nothing to lose really. Oh, it would also have had the benefit of getting any FUTURE growth of value, out of his estate and that growth would be in the trust.
So many good points.
I've got ZERO idea why he continues to stick his head in the sand and think it will go awah. HE is the one that will 'go away' (when his time comes) and the problem will simply get worse.
So, you might be able to keep the property as a single unit, which ought to enhance its resale value later on if so decided???
None of the above was legal advice, medical advice, nor astrology advice
Good luck with what ever road you choose.